From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>
Subject: Re: rados and the next firefly release v0.80.11
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:24:29 +0200
Message-ID: <562A977D.2060909@dachary.org>
References: <562A94F9.2080501@dachary.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="Sw8ptoHt5OKHVHOxPVehw5ETCxFNQrAdj"
Return-path: <ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:49029 "EHLO
	smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751220AbbJWUYb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 23 Oct 2015 16:24:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <562A94F9.2080501@dachary.org>
Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org>
To: Samuel Just <sjust@redhat.com>
Cc: Ceph Development <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz>

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--Sw8ptoHt5OKHVHOxPVehw5ETCxFNQrAdj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<sjustwork> looks good to me

On 23/10/2015 22:13, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>=20
> The next firefly release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/=
firefly passed the rados suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644#note=
-110). Do you think the firefly branch is ready for QE to start their own=
 round of testing ?
>=20
> Cheers
>=20

--=20
Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


--Sw8ptoHt5OKHVHOxPVehw5ETCxFNQrAdj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlYql30ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22sRACgsz9KPhH/Qn6X5etoIOib9G3G
Iv0Amwa1IhCPHy/m9ZZ8BUplerbeaypG
=PmRE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sw8ptoHt5OKHVHOxPVehw5ETCxFNQrAdj--