From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpoVX-0002fS-PX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:24:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpoVU-00024j-Nj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:24:35 -0400 Received: from mail1.vodafone.ie ([213.233.128.43]:24924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZpoVU-00023w-Hh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:24:32 -0400 References: <1445522453-14450-1-git-send-email-P@draigBrady.com> <5628F4BC.2040502@redhat.com> <5628F634.6040809@redhat.com> <5628FE20.80802@draigBrady.com> <56290152.7010408@redhat.com> <562908A6.3000307@redhat.com> <56290B55.2000703@redhat.com> <20151022173919.GC14789@potion.brq.redhat.com> <56293D5D.2030107@redhat.com> <562A16BB.6080006@draigBrady.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=c3=a1draig_Brady?= Message-ID: <562AEBDD.7070701@draigBrady.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 03:24:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <562A16BB.6080006@draigBrady.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] copy, dd: simplify and optimize NUL bytes detection List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?B?UmFkaW0gS3LEjW3DocWZ?= Cc: Rusty Russell , coreutils@gnu.org, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 23/10/15 12:15, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 22/10/15 20:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> >> >> On 22/10/2015 19:39, Radim Krčmář wrote: >>> 2015-10-22 18:14+0200, Paolo Bonzini: >>>> On 22/10/2015 18:02, Eric Blake wrote: >>>>> I see a bug in there: >>>> >>>> Of course. You shouldn't have told me what the bug was, I deserved >>>> to look for it myself. :) >>> >>> It rather seems that you don't want spoilers, :) >>> >>> I see two bugs now. >> >> Me too. :) But Rusty surely has some testcases in case he wants to >> adopt some of the ideas here. O:-) > > For completeness this should address the bugs I think? > > bool memeqzero4_paolo(const void *data, size_t length) > { > const unsigned char *p = data; > unsigned long word; Note the original coreutils code accessed a word at a time, but only on aligned buffers. The code below may generate unaligned accesses for unaligned sizes or buffers. You can avoid that by auto degenerating back to byte at a time access using: #if _STRING_ARCH_unaligned unsigned long word; #else unsigned char word; #endif > > if (!length) > return true; > > /* Check len bytes not aligned on a word. */ > while (__builtin_expect(length & (sizeof(word) - 1), 0)) { > if (*p) > return false; > p++; > length--; > if (!length) > return true; > } > > /* Check up to 16 bytes a word at a time. */ > for (;;) { > memcpy(&word, p, sizeof(word)); > if (word) > return false; > p += sizeof(word); > length -= sizeof(word); > if (!length) > return true; > if (__builtin_expect(length & 15, 0) == 0) > break; > } > > /* Now we know that's zero, memcmp with self. */ > return memcmp(data, p, length) == 0; > } cheers, Pádraig.