From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F8860657 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iofz202 with SMTP id z202so154265281iof.2 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:00:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qSzvGGVs7ekNT9fsaTM920Adk8zDGCtDNyEH/6+Ebcw=; b=HZh3/F0ND3ZTv1ilRcelj4au+SsNZ0G5wvU8PpeXiwX6xIKIrPr058ClhBRMJyZQoI qlMpAb4sppf6tjQO+cUDkp8e7CPs51vPEgDJqkgjbVr7aU3XUC4ZjSDcJJmT65YW1MSE 5YAHmw2Dzo4/SSVWR+mLd/W7dnoTppPbI9nYundn2Iy1Jo+6Doa3CU7OPw5A9QY1Axcs QVJL5xTzCyOTAudz/Mps0SeC21h9jyFjBOxCvhxUN/zDLG5bclA3JfWvf/86qwi9+kmJ dTkH1rLKFV8jdrkbzQ7gBrjfIm/tRJe8fN7n0UUoyATQDGPSO0ajnKJHJ+WBQQLFqVun Hm6w== X-Received: by 10.107.41.3 with SMTP id p3mr16768358iop.80.1445724053268; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l198sm2601765iol.37.2015.10.24.15.00.52 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:00:52 -0700 (PDT) To: Koen Kooi , Nicolas Dechesne References: <65454D5E-98C5-4BA7-828B-05BBD56FB3E5@dominion.thruhere.net> From: Trevor Woerner Message-ID: <562BFF92.9020407@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:00:50 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <65454D5E-98C5-4BA7-828B-05BBD56FB3E5@dominion.thruhere.net> Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: How to handle mesa customization in BSP layers X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:00:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/20/15 05:37, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 20 okt. 2015, om 11:32 heeft Nicolas Dechesne het volgende geschreven: >> >> >> The issue is that mesa is arch specific, not machine specific. So if >> you start mixing machines from the same arch, we are getting >> unexpected/wrong rebuilds. > In this specific case I think we should enable freedreno for armv7/armv8 in OE-core, but the problem remains for other recipes like this. Are you suggesting that every armv7 device should have their mesa tuned for freedreno and freedreno added to their filesystem? That seems quite overly-broad! On the surface[1] it would seem as though the decisions as to how one builds mesa and which graphics solution to install is more similar to the decision as to which DEFAULTTUNE to use, rather than which architecture is involved? [1] which is my way of saying "I don't have the experience of actually having done this, unlike you people" ;-)