From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 84C46E00C06; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:14:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.223.180 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * 1.2 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist * [URIs: gherzan.ro] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CB1E00BFD for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ioll68 with SMTP id l68so155633001iol.3 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:14:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BfwqJDTaalZq/L0xgo+biogL5bzalPJRaHMBHCaKADE=; b=XfLxfwwAppEmqPHik7ICZKiARkoLAulJ1pDkLeqpTqRak1V+tkhYnBUL/UfU1EBxfu lZt52HE8B13RsnrIt11Kipdt6hjyVsQKNBm4hiCSG5Wb9QR/v+HUEwJrK0X8KCZX+R5/ JU2J5D8otxX9qoprJPmmgfyy4iZAPKwAjNIhhwcTqs+H6XmXHinqfNbf7xlCXKLbwanu i4CgyjsFRf3zsGh4GvMw80sMV3HGaAi+Iw7DgcWiriozxUwVqbRYqBOd60mIN9CWubpb S1fazdqkM7fl01EpvI4doUKzs4Iy82hN9pTf1pfgNxZ4uT3SutUtCVT8hOFLjK8SH/F6 XVpw== X-Received: by 10.107.136.67 with SMTP id k64mr27097340iod.117.1445724849112; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h13sm10400127ioe.32.2015.10.24.15.14.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:14:08 -0700 (PDT) To: Nicolas Aguirre , Andrei Gherzan References: From: Trevor Woerner Message-ID: <562C02AE.9030609@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:14:06 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-chip] Yocto on the 9$ computer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:14:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/24/15 15:58, Nicolas Aguirre wrote: > 2015-10-24 19:26 GMT+02:00 Andrei Gherzan : > >> Have a C.H.I.P. 9$ computer? It works with Yocto now. >> >> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-chip/ >> > Good job. > IMO it make sense to add C.H.I.P support in meta-sunxi, don't you think ? Interesting: I had the exact same thought, had started to compose a reply, but then thought about layers such as meta-beagleboard and meta-raspberrypi :-) Unfortunately there isn't much oversight/guidance in BSP-land. It's entirely understandable (the work involved would be monstrous, and the existing infrastructure can barely keep up with the tiny handful of BSPs that are currently used for validation) but can be a bit frustrating nonetheless. Do we create layers for every board (meta-chip, meta-raspberrypi, meta-beagleboard) or do we create layers for SoCs themselves (meta-sunxi, meta-atmel, meta-rockchip)[1]? Currently there is no "correct" answer. Unfortunately the distinction between SoCs, boards, MACHINEs, DEFAULTTUNEs, and DISTROs isn't as clear and as clean as one would like. :-) Trevor [1] and let's not forget layers such as meta-ettus and meta-gumstix: companies who make various boards with various SoCs!