From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 58C52E00B58; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:26:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.215.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-lf0-f43.google.com (mail-lf0-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFB4E00473 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lffz202 with SMTP id z202so111874061lff.3 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:26:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1wVfLj/XHIL+PzM0zAoCFFafJLXXjUHdsKD9B1YiOZY=; b=ReOCU0rcd3e8LF5tQ+RRgfxKeFfMTkePnM1TF2+QeL9lteih0VSk0jdx/I00L3QFIe z6OyzYSvO1O1MySTZEw45hoMd9YyJ+tB4NliYdTWRX8OO2nZbsW+sz8Q5LEtp1Xr6Ie6 W0x+vUcdrOQg3hH/Hl4By4JelLTaV2fRPcKJ0mOX3nJ6GK6LQ02aKWt6mBVypvxSWCJa uRXCm8gMmRq9NuK7PAZXGyxnvG7LROzXyEy1zeAd2gtvhIHxZen0raErPQMHTMUsecl3 4z+Aeji+E6zC845WIS/QfXHDeKRB+P/pYOEaf0y69QFMAOmdYw4RpY+aJYEO821vI1IJ T2xQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQml5gbSoY1x/Gmv0LObwi8gkba6pmENsjRolCKdHgi6HMO0USKXgyvKnGMzccB8T+BHqeVA MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.131.70 with SMTP id ok6mr13961681lbb.71.1445707583752; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.198.71 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:26:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [93.104.180.249] Received: by 10.112.198.71 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:26:23 +0200 Message-ID: From: Andrei Gherzan To: Yocto Project Subject: [meta-chip] Yocto on the 9$ computer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:26:28 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b343402faa4f40522dd063b --047d7b343402faa4f40522dd063b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, Have a C.H.I.P. 9$ computer? It works with Yocto now. http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-chip/ Happy hacking! Andrei --047d7b343402faa4f40522dd063b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

Hi all,

Have a C.H.I.P. 9$ computer? It works with Yocto now.

http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-chip/

Happy hacking!

Andrei

--047d7b343402faa4f40522dd063b-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 45E29E00B58; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:59:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 1.2 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist * [URIs: gherzan.ro] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (aguirre.nicolas[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.213.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-vk0-f42.google.com (mail-vk0-f42.google.com [209.85.213.42]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED668E00473 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vkfw189 with SMTP id w189so79537475vkf.2 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:59:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=wSRWRtjGt2NnGP1HOj17ado8uEKoiVQ+Q5jurY1CW04=; b=0N31PZ7+62/8oyfLcx/K/LDuTO6mFwa2A0yKyWp1QqbxUWr8jridzoosHg7Runr8gH YTh4aX+nCSFB39UXmQ3j8g1JkkSivphNxZ3oOzKXuTDYSME/uXBBEL8Mkbu0K8irIXaT pAVQ0Gbq8CVjEOeAa0LEJvuxKU6J6XaxylDupawo8oM3avWvbjFiTOCycm0oCP3UHaaW aicPD5y6gXCx4LhATHV1ndXByaXeHn4Lv3/KgR0Bku++5beG80ZttND4LmtQ5WXU1GHn BWFJcPRmu+4nPrC5Z2kOorgaFCrWRssK4tihDYugMuQxSs04lQiLx+ioANKRfsUgpKwC DdJg== X-Received: by 10.31.180.1 with SMTP id d1mr18279898vkf.131.1445716742343; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:59:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.5.70 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 12:58:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Nicolas Aguirre Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 21:58:42 +0200 Message-ID: To: Andrei Gherzan Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-chip] Yocto on the 9$ computer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:59:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2015-10-24 19:26 GMT+02:00 Andrei Gherzan : > Hi all, > Hi Andrei, > Have a C.H.I.P. 9$ computer? It works with Yocto now. > > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-chip/ > Good job. IMO it make sense to add C.H.I.P support in meta-sunxi, don't you think ? https://github.com/linux-sunxi/meta-sunxi Regards, Nicolas > Happy hacking! > > Andrei > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > -- Nicolas Aguirre Mail: aguirre.nicolas@gmail.com Web: http://www.calaos.fr Blog: http://dev.enlightenment.fr/~captainigloo/ From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 55C6EE00B58; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:13:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.212.175 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 1.2 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist * [URIs: gherzan.ro] Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB740E00473 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so117696999wij.0 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:13:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=XZbPAE+2SIb8nuxlUn4M12FxJHHsOaJxtcxIkbf8dOw=; b=elQvqBOVM/ib7035NUiXdVnZ+737W+d1foKUPUDecH7F9i9gMI43a2z4zJGWnbmxEv pIIc5sDw8cXK0rfV1l6MWFwMHDPT4PIvyEy1G5Wolo27bUS6NcMbSNwmQZlRWW5GdEuN fJgYklmahy73OBiwScoZA5LIHpOzFLPU1UxKEcBangHnpOcNc5RuuCtJoDUcoTP7nA22 dczhlaHTqZJPBIXNPXG3TNYOAYprwCN4xTRR76AO0stmqIKxJmzdXwtvPRmZF7bnF1TK d/KbRSZxmIrsUNBoewD/cH9BJXrYtUx/84xN9FuC7d1oF4WkKPYXMW6WRRNkWkW355cF U4iA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQltq2MlLGhNGvxmNmImnyWlBLWSV7HLmLJZyde6CwRh3cwOMz4trC0TR6k/Oq6hUhmiAfT0 X-Received: by 10.28.146.146 with SMTP id u140mr1126436wmd.85.1445717583313; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:13:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resin (dslb-088-067-185-162.088.067.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [88.67.185.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id om1sm26592448wjc.2.2015.10.24.13.13.01 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:13:00 +0200 From: Andrei Gherzan To: Nicolas Aguirre Message-ID: <20151024201300.GG4459@resin> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-chip] Yocto on the 9$ computer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:13:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:58:42PM +0200, Nicolas Aguirre wrote: > 2015-10-24 19:26 GMT+02:00 Andrei Gherzan : > > Hi all, > > > > Hi Andrei, > > > Have a C.H.I.P. 9$ computer? It works with Yocto now. > > > > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-chip/ > > > Good job. > IMO it make sense to add C.H.I.P support in meta-sunxi, don't you think ? > > https://github.com/linux-sunxi/meta-sunxi > Well. Temporary it is a separate layer. And this is mainly because of the overhead you need for flashing the board. So I do see a benefit in keeping it separately. We will see in time. Thanks for feedback. -- Andrei Gherzan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 67594E00B66; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:46:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (ajlennon[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 1.2 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist * [URIs: gherzan.ro] * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.212.182 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0AAE00473 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so117375292wik.1 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:46:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EYkZ17SW06ovre5VdSMfd/8XuvTbq94NqY5x6RFetu4=; b=ln/OT10qlXd5CGbGAcs0DTbrA3rx66v3AOu1KTg8rl97GsmqIHQ8/MWm5x5pt3tKIH njRCp4ejoLzv5wZvUI/wAr0P6Y+fkFttHBypySGV+JpI0kW+RnTYnG/RTtxaPvxGaet+ pZFUWo8dv1UqL79M9A1vwkJvSnFD8q93XWrdUjOKdjQ5mSxVb9BeZZ4ixfumY6iJgsFK 8xLb9RezZde59uIo2/XHLkBDBAQoAISU8HcAfT2jDUbJKIyjreiQQ6vBMw7XYmBZyo2g imylStD2nY50w+cb/zvP4k9xtEOYA3mvPzGqYNRznT8XSwN4D5ZJAX2kKVsO+JxgAkEj dzNQ== X-Received: by 10.180.189.41 with SMTP id gf9mr10711433wic.95.1445719604011; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.150.69.210] (92.40.249.12.threembb.co.uk. [92.40.249.12]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j3sm4256830wib.13.2015.10.24.13.46.42 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Alex J Lennon X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13A452) In-Reply-To: <20151024201300.GG4459@resin> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 21:46:41 +0100 Message-Id: References: <20151024201300.GG4459@resin> To: Andrei Gherzan Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-chip] Yocto on the 9$ computer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:46:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> On 24 Oct 2015, at 21:13, Andrei Gherzan wrote: >>=20 >>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:58:42PM +0200, Nicolas Aguirre wrote: >>> 2015-10-24 19:26 GMT+02:00 Andrei Gherzan : >>> Hi all, >>=20 >> Hi Andrei, >>=20 >>> Have a C.H.I.P. 9$ computer? It works with Yocto now. >>>=20 >>> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-chi= p/ >> Good job. >> IMO it make sense to add C.H.I.P support in meta-sunxi, don't you think= ? >>=20 >> https://github.com/linux-sunxi/meta-sunxi >=20 > Well. Temporary it is a separate layer. And this is mainly because of th= e > overhead you need for flashing the board. So I do see a benefit in keepi= ng it > separately. We will see in time. >=20 > Thanks for feedback. Great work Andrei. I have a couple of CHiPs here and was trying to decide = whether meta-sunxi would provide what was needed or whether we needed a cus= tom layer. I've been hugely impressed with what Docker+Resin gives me for application= deployment management so I'd like to look at how easy it is to take your L= inux/u-boot CHiP support and deploy via Resin.=20 Are you at the point you have a base OS image for CHiP with Resin support?= If not I would be interested in having a look at this with you. Cheers, Alex > -- > Andrei Gherzan > --=20 > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 82AA5E00B66; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 14:06:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.212.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 1.2 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist * [URIs: gherzan.ro] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526A3E00473 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 14:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so117666139wik.1 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 14:06:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=huKBVQDY42Mlmpvw16mjTz1/Q1AQ2izDjbZiQtOmFQA=; b=Jtkni3ole7YLsZbKwyZMZF1jD/01/QLRXMX3bH4BHwhoFJoU5cip0p0r5PVUmehQRC ZU1h+MZtuvrmOYmZ+ALcGUJhgmpzK/oj4ccMD7l9tERpyzyJfQsZlKl8hYFT4c1N3v1y Y2AkaVmjzedQ5fU80Z4qg/+BJTGaiMh5SHQCpoCoCLgn/IhFcoZ73AOCRv0vbz3ZRMNu CwtEuPvnX56enJC/w+CNrzIW68qWKHtJNjy5oGDnjfl5NNvWxD6meVdhoV0+LHepmDUV OmxuSYfjbKW6nSXABgXR2ez6AygaaPKOv3NDheOb0R0U3PH8k3Ui1x86V9/+FxdGnCT3 /zjA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmy32s2VjzQFixvDk8DfoxgzkVMQSjn8UwKid17YlA5osViMl2soIoPX/dtWDIeYgWgBYLg X-Received: by 10.180.73.244 with SMTP id o20mr12257320wiv.9.1445720796744; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 14:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from resin (dslb-088-067-185-162.088.067.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [88.67.185.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l1sm1442428wmb.1.2015.10.24.14.06.35 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Oct 2015 14:06:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 23:06:33 +0200 From: Andrei Gherzan To: Alex J Lennon Message-ID: <20151024210633.GH4459@resin> References: <20151024201300.GG4459@resin> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-chip] Yocto on the 9$ computer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 21:06:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:46:41PM +0100, Alex J Lennon wrote: > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 24 Oct 2015, at 21:13, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > >> > >>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:58:42PM +0200, Nicolas Aguirre wrote: > >>> 2015-10-24 19:26 GMT+02:00 Andrei Gherzan : > >>> Hi all, > >> > >> Hi Andrei, > >> > >>> Have a C.H.I.P. 9$ computer? It works with Yocto now. > >>> > >>> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-chip/ > >> Good job. > >> IMO it make sense to add C.H.I.P support in meta-sunxi, don't you think ? > >> > >> https://github.com/linux-sunxi/meta-sunxi > > > > Well. Temporary it is a separate layer. And this is mainly because of the > > overhead you need for flashing the board. So I do see a benefit in keeping it > > separately. We will see in time. > > > > Thanks for feedback. > > Great work Andrei. I have a couple of CHiPs here and was trying to decide whether meta-sunxi would provide what was needed or whether we needed a custom layer. > > I've been hugely impressed with what Docker+Resin gives me for application deployment management so I'd like to look at how easy it is to take your Linux/u-boot CHiP support and deploy via Resin. > > Are you at the point you have a base OS image for CHiP with Resin support? If not I would be interested in having a look at this with you. > We definitely thought about that already. The problem is that we currently rely on a BTRFS partition for the docker runtime environment. This obviously won't work on a flash raw device. So if you want to dig into this I can give you some hints, otherwise we will just tackle it when we will get to it. Andrei -- Andrei Gherzan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 84C46E00C06; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:14:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.223.180 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * 1.2 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist * [URIs: gherzan.ro] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com (mail-io0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CB1E00BFD for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ioll68 with SMTP id l68so155633001iol.3 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:14:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BfwqJDTaalZq/L0xgo+biogL5bzalPJRaHMBHCaKADE=; b=XfLxfwwAppEmqPHik7ICZKiARkoLAulJ1pDkLeqpTqRak1V+tkhYnBUL/UfU1EBxfu lZt52HE8B13RsnrIt11Kipdt6hjyVsQKNBm4hiCSG5Wb9QR/v+HUEwJrK0X8KCZX+R5/ JU2J5D8otxX9qoprJPmmgfyy4iZAPKwAjNIhhwcTqs+H6XmXHinqfNbf7xlCXKLbwanu i4CgyjsFRf3zsGh4GvMw80sMV3HGaAi+Iw7DgcWiriozxUwVqbRYqBOd60mIN9CWubpb S1fazdqkM7fl01EpvI4doUKzs4Iy82hN9pTf1pfgNxZ4uT3SutUtCVT8hOFLjK8SH/F6 XVpw== X-Received: by 10.107.136.67 with SMTP id k64mr27097340iod.117.1445724849112; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h13sm10400127ioe.32.2015.10.24.15.14.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:14:08 -0700 (PDT) To: Nicolas Aguirre , Andrei Gherzan References: From: Trevor Woerner Message-ID: <562C02AE.9030609@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:14:06 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-chip] Yocto on the 9$ computer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:14:10 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/24/15 15:58, Nicolas Aguirre wrote: > 2015-10-24 19:26 GMT+02:00 Andrei Gherzan : > >> Have a C.H.I.P. 9$ computer? It works with Yocto now. >> >> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-chip/ >> > Good job. > IMO it make sense to add C.H.I.P support in meta-sunxi, don't you think ? Interesting: I had the exact same thought, had started to compose a reply, but then thought about layers such as meta-beagleboard and meta-raspberrypi :-) Unfortunately there isn't much oversight/guidance in BSP-land. It's entirely understandable (the work involved would be monstrous, and the existing infrastructure can barely keep up with the tiny handful of BSPs that are currently used for validation) but can be a bit frustrating nonetheless. Do we create layers for every board (meta-chip, meta-raspberrypi, meta-beagleboard) or do we create layers for SoCs themselves (meta-sunxi, meta-atmel, meta-rockchip)[1]? Currently there is no "correct" answer. Unfortunately the distinction between SoCs, boards, MACHINEs, DEFAULTTUNEs, and DISTROs isn't as clear and as clean as one would like. :-) Trevor [1] and let's not forget layers such as meta-ettus and meta-gumstix: companies who make various boards with various SoCs! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id DF5ADE00B66; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:17:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.213.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com (mail-ig0-f174.google.com [209.85.213.174]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD36E00473 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so37090629igb.0 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:17:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ik0STpnxapkf8dNRx1Zl1ekAgqKXgkkVgLoTBJT3eEU=; b=iVXqcuEWNeS9rlkNwZebI9/uxX9FaFuKIf4om5NMM4f9Yu8wgZ+w/PucNo1LdqWx9p rqTZGKVMaw0n9TAaS3Nh/gUHBAab7xvRJcVQa7tiRWjLawVt92UZl8E7fgkBOL5y1Pqg 94rR5RF9Vfx2uK7DVyG9FPku5DeC8scnAZLJBdvA3t8keZxl5iZe5LLdHvo7bwIVyON3 gsyRdwsKrPNnDWcxLtsQDaaJYBAK2wv5KAZubVYn/yo8wsJdKFqvj0WrwCHEF6iJ9NGC i/2mGX9mDqSJXdj0r25wcFpgAxI0gbT0fzfIi1We3JL9gWgVb4x0LUjNI1QwJGI003NZ W9LA== X-Received: by 10.50.97.37 with SMTP id dx5mr9751860igb.14.1445725025346; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:17:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.141.85] (dsl-67-55-28-109.acanac.net. [67.55.28.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o74sm10420963ioo.8.2015.10.24.15.17.04 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Oct 2015 15:17:04 -0700 (PDT) To: Nicolas Aguirre , Andrei Gherzan References: <562C02AE.9030609@gmail.com> From: Trevor Woerner Message-ID: <562C035E.2020705@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:17:02 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <562C02AE.9030609@gmail.com> Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-chip] Yocto on the 9$ computer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 22:17:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/24/15 18:14, Trevor Woerner wrote: > Unfortunately the distinction between SoCs, boards, > MACHINEs, DEFAULTTUNEs, and DISTROs isn't as clear and as clean as one > would like. Oops! The distinction between these ideas is clear, what isn't clear is how to divide them up into layers (imho). From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 54D1EE00B8F; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 02:37:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL, URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.7 SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (softfail) * 1.2 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist * [URIs: gherzan.ro] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (www.dynamicdevices.co.uk [89.200.136.37]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74713E00978 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 02:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD8527E3D5; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:37:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at lennoab2.miniserver.com Received: from www.dynamicdevices.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (www.dynamicdevices.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4FFdknZigUSd; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:36:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cpc47-live22-2-0-cust92.17-2.cable.virginm.net [86.17.157.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.dynamicdevices.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EA9C27E3CF; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:36:51 +0000 (UTC) To: Andrei Gherzan References: <20151024201300.GG4459@resin> <20151024210633.GH4459@resin> From: Alex J Lennon Message-ID: <562DF42A.6020600@dynamicdevices.co.uk> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:36:42 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151024210633.GH4459@resin> Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-chip] Yocto on the 9$ computer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:37:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 24/10/2015 22:06, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:46:41PM +0100, Alex J Lennon wrote: >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >>>> On 24 Oct 2015, at 21:13, Andrei Gherzan wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:58:42PM +0200, Nicolas Aguirre wrote: >>>>> 2015-10-24 19:26 GMT+02:00 Andrei Gherzan : >>>>> Hi all, >>>> Hi Andrei, >>>> >>>>> Have a C.H.I.P. 9$ computer? It works with Yocto now. >>>>> >>>>> http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-chip/ >>>> Good job. >>>> IMO it make sense to add C.H.I.P support in meta-sunxi, don't you think ? >>>> >>>> https://github.com/linux-sunxi/meta-sunxi >>> Well. Temporary it is a separate layer. And this is mainly because of the >>> overhead you need for flashing the board. So I do see a benefit in keeping it >>> separately. We will see in time. >>> >>> Thanks for feedback. >> Great work Andrei. I have a couple of CHiPs here and was trying to decide whether meta-sunxi would provide what was needed or whether we needed a custom layer. >> >> I've been hugely impressed with what Docker+Resin gives me for application deployment management so I'd like to look at how easy it is to take your Linux/u-boot CHiP support and deploy via Resin. >> >> Are you at the point you have a base OS image for CHiP with Resin support? If not I would be interested in having a look at this with you. >> > We definitely thought about that already. The problem is that we currently rely > on a BTRFS partition for the docker runtime environment. This obviously won't > work on a flash raw device. So if you want to dig into this I can give you some > hints, otherwise we will just tackle it when we will get to it. > > Are you making use of any BTRFS specific features or should be it fairly straightforward to use JFFS2 or similar? Presumably BTRFS will sit happily on other devices with eMMC? Best, Alex From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 05AAAE00B88; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:53:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_JP_SURBL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (raj.khem[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 1.2 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist * [URIs: gherzan.ro] Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com [209.85.220.51]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93A2E00B5D for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by padhk11 with SMTP id hk11so88611137pad.1 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:52:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=8V2h9ZJzuGrZ4ocTfC2+S7IdSygju6cJ3LaL46h9O5g=; b=u2fcwKir1fBz+u0ZHziD1Lcgy/MPB6hf0i7WZBHqzVudpVnfxQI18MIVlob7RToMeN iu9jUedm+IAst6nSy62TbLI5oZwbzEORy8aloPhjwYlT6gMA5HU2/yveHnYhW7m/cRqw BP9bQui39JHEeqDMVkMWpR8LDvVp1lmkJt4df/+ia3Ow1y5ZOsGvuV9wfSQJEyGoGX0D hlCZJbEduQngcpi5px71qXXIxcIMQ8ABNljeAfDN8uekPwJ0CpK+AL8mQ2lzKH9Djw4A ZbcHWd61zfn9VnwbBjiVSIeeR4ZlL/KtO0W06QJ3MKH5JjlA+qP/6u0pPiDHoJZ+btVH MoSQ== X-Received: by 10.68.65.67 with SMTP id v3mr12112106pbs.69.1446252776126; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:641:c000:1d0:9139:22be:56a:125d? ([2601:641:c000:1d0:9139:22be:56a:125d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lo9sm10451668pab.19.2015.10.30.17.52.54 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:52:55 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2 From: Khem Raj In-Reply-To: <20151024201300.GG4459@resin> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:52:52 -0700 Message-Id: <45191C4C-00D7-484A-AFEF-D7DBFD2908DB@gmail.com> References: <20151024201300.GG4459@resin> To: Andrei Gherzan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Cc: Yocto Project Subject: Re: [meta-chip] Yocto on the 9$ computer X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 00:53:02 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 27106 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_81B427FD-9B7A-4FD5-BB8A-B8364964B994"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 --Apple-Mail=_81B427FD-9B7A-4FD5-BB8A-B8364964B994 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Andrei good work. > On Oct 24, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: >=20 > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 09:58:42PM +0200, Nicolas Aguirre wrote: >> 2015-10-24 19:26 GMT+02:00 Andrei Gherzan : >>> Hi all, >>>=20 >>=20 >> Hi Andrei, >>=20 >>> Have a C.H.I.P. 9$ computer? It works with Yocto now. >>>=20 >>> = http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-chip/ >>>=20 >> Good job. >> IMO it make sense to add C.H.I.P support in meta-sunxi, don't you = think ? >>=20 >> https://github.com/linux-sunxi/meta-sunxi >>=20 >=20 > Well. Temporary it is a separate layer. And this is mainly because of = the > overhead you need for flashing the board. So I do see a benefit in = keeping it > separately. We will see in time. what does board flashing has to do with layer infrastructure ? when creating a new layer all we should think that it should make it = easy for end user to use the ecosystem and reduce confusion. That also might mean that you = may have different layers for chips coming from same SOC vendor but it is contextual, e.g. if you = are using same u-boot and kernel trees as rest of sunxi then you better align it in = sunxi layer e.g. >=20 > Thanks for feedback. >=20 > -- > Andrei Gherzan > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto --Apple-Mail=_81B427FD-9B7A-4FD5-BB8A-B8364964B994 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlY0EOgACgkQuwUzVZGdMxQr9ACfRZMLfdz8kDUCOhzo3zycy1A+ Kr8AnRUN2/WrLwCPnD4OFtXZyqeiZI6/ =REcU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_81B427FD-9B7A-4FD5-BB8A-B8364964B994--