From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jevon Qiao Subject: Re: why package ceph-fuse needs packages ceph? Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:31:52 +0800 Message-ID: <562E0118.5000405@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:36439 "EHLO mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753634AbbJZKb5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 06:31:57 -0400 Received: by pacfv9 with SMTP id fv9so193362103pac.3 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 03:31:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil Cc: Jaze Lee , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sage, Here comes another question, does ceph-fuse support Unix OS(like HP-UNIX or AIX)? Thanks, Jevon On 26/10/15 15:19, Sage Weil wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2015, Jaze Lee wrote: >> Hello, >> I think the ceph-fuse is just a client, why it needs packages ceph? >> I found when i install ceph-fuse, it will install package ceph. >> But when i install ceph-common, it will not install package ceph. >> >> May be ceph-fuse is not just a ceph client? >> > It is, and the Debian packaging works as expected. This is a simple > error in the spec file. I'll submit a patch. > > sage > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html