From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 39CFBE00B9A; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:32:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (net147[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.49 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com (mail-pa0-f49.google.com [209.85.220.49]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9465FE00B8F for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:31:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pasz6 with SMTP id z6so186283281pas.2 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:31:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TLZno4eEVQhWNvy2IgjlKg7/dHIPrXqg3XVi71iAQ6I=; b=hgkeU7Xo9zcjd9kvITPYE6Qzrhbz1gGWQiftsh2T1ET8lQjNUnZLXrDRCiKd/GQl6c t7vydVLagp3S0JyiDnHcGVblxr2nWy5qXG46lbuNL4MT5HL7pbv8T1iennoFgc6fgtBu J6f3ofm674qHKuoA/l9acgj+YWK6rgnoyvCC23hYky4jLvdpJpjV1Zmyf/YtpcB9qMFB IC7fpy5DgxpfCZglbz//0W5oYNm+DPyng4rO/zl3KlT4nmC6iFsgegaJIq0J5wVrdPqd v3duQurt5syTRUzL9gGTqnXn+MSgFgJ3jysdSWrXLktMfzBW6PipilVRfbtetElxYNZe epQQ== X-Received: by 10.66.251.72 with SMTP id zi8mr15176479pac.67.1445859116381; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:31:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (60-242-179-244.static.tpgi.com.au. [60.242.179.244]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rc5sm33489022pbc.95.2015.10.26.04.31.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Oct 2015 04:31:55 -0700 (PDT) To: Otavio Salvador References: <1445812988-6456-1-git-send-email-net147@gmail.com> <5542134.NUiWrkt5lN@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> <562DE34F.2040905@gmail.com> From: Jonathan Liu Message-ID: <562E0F23.1040404@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:31:47 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: Paul Eggleton , Otavio Salvador , yocto Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v2] qtbase: enable Raspberry Pi support X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 11:32:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 26/10/2015 10:28 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote: >> On 26/10/2015 7:08 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: >> It would rebuild qtbase (and recipes depending on it) without Raspberry Pi >> support for other machines. >> I see similar machine-specific do_configure_prepend elsewhere (e.g. >> https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-arm/blob/master/qt5-layer/recipes-qt/qt5/qtbase_%25.bbappend). >> >> Otavio, any thoughts on a better way to handle this? > We handle this moving it to a SoC subarch and using a dynamic package > arch handler to put every package depending on it as a subarch as > well. Ideally we could split the QPA module and build it separated. No > clue if it is possible or not. > So for meta-fsl-arm, would only the qtbase-plugins package be using machine-specific arch and the other qtbase packages be using non-machine-specific arch? Or is it done on a per-recipe rather than per-package granularity? Regards, Jonathan