From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PV: properly populate descriptor tables
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 14:58:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562E3FA3.5030707@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562E3EDF.5040502@citrix.com>
On 26/10/15 14:55, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 26/10/15 14:43, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 23/09/15 16:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Us extending the GDT limit past the Xen descriptors so far meant that
>>> guests (including user mode programs) accessing any descriptor table
>>> slot above the original OS'es limit but below the first Xen descriptor
>>> caused a #PF, converted to a #GP in our #PF handler. Which is quite
>>> different from the native behavior, where some of such accesses (LAR
>>> and LSL) don't fault. Mimic that behavior by mapping a blank page into
>>> unused slots.
>>>
>>> While not strictly required, treat the LDT the same for consistency.
>> This change causes a 32-bit userspace process running in a 32-bit PV
>> guest to segfault.
>>
>> The process is a Go program and it is using the modify_ldt() system call
>> (which is successful) but loading %gs with the new descriptor causes a
>> fault. Even a minimal (empty main()) go program faults.
> D'uh - its obvious now you point it out.
>
> By filling the shadow ldt slots as present, zero entries, we break their
> demand-faulting.
>
> We can't be safe to incorrect faults from LAR/LSL, *and* perform demand
> faulting of the LDT.
Wait. Yes we can. I am talking nonsense.
Hunk 2 should be reverted, and the demand fault handler should populate
a zero entry rather than passing #GP back to the guest.
~Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-26 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 15:34 [PATCH] x86/PV: properly populate descriptor tables Jan Beulich
2015-09-23 15:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-09-24 16:18 ` Wei Liu
2015-10-26 14:43 ` David Vrabel
2015-10-26 14:55 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-10-26 14:58 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2015-10-26 15:08 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-26 15:41 ` David Vrabel
2015-10-26 15:58 ` Jan Beulich
2015-10-26 16:02 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562E3FA3.5030707@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.