From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com (sanddollar.geekisp.com [216.168.135.167]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F2CD769A7 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9895 invoked by uid 1003); 26 Oct 2015 22:08:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.16.32.95?) (philip@opensdr.com@207.114.172.147) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 26 Oct 2015 22:08:01 -0000 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <562E9F28.3070508@balister.org> From: Philip Balister Message-ID: <562EA440.6040103@balister.org> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:08:00 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Updates to mesa and llvm X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:08:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 10/26/2015 02:59 PM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > Le 26 oct. 2015 22:46, "Philip Balister" a écrit : >> >> Recently I need to get the llvmpipe driver running with mesa. I ended up >> adding a llvm-3.7 recipe and updating mesa to 10.6.8. Not sure if going >> to 11.x.y also works. > > I was told 2 weeks ago that updates to 10.6.8 was too late for this cycle, > and Ross said we could cherry pick patches from upstream if needed.. > > As for 11.x, we have patches ready for next cycle.. As soon as we can > update master we will send them. That is what I thought. llvm3.3 doesn't work with mesa-10 (and I assume 11), so I'll send that in soon, unless there is a compelling reason not to. It does look like we support multiple llvm versions. Philip > >> >> I'd like to upstream these since they configuration actually worked and >> performance was much better. I recall some discussion lately about this >> process and wanted to make sure I didn't break anything :) >> >> I'll send on the llvm 3.7 stuff this week, since it should work in >> parallel with the older recipe. I do need to move the license file >> checksum into the version specific piece. >> >> The timing on the mesa update is trickier since we are trying to >> stabilize the oe-core release. >> >> Comments? Will adding another llvm recipe cause trouble for other > packages? >> >> Philip >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> Openembedded-devel mailing list >> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel