From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964844AbbJ0Pbb (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:31:31 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:36783 "EHLO mail-qk0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932274AbbJ0Pba (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:31:30 -0400 Subject: Re: Inline hunt results for 4.3.0-rc1 To: Denys Vlasenko References: From: Peter Hurley Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Oleg Nesterov , Greg KH Message-ID: <562F98CE.4070200@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:31:26 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [ +cc Greg KH] On 10/27/2015 10:32 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > Hi, > > I have created a set of semi-automated scripts which look for > large inlines in the kernel. > > Recently I taught it to even generate "git format-patch" patches > (unfortunately, only for inlines in *.c files, not *.h), > and here are they for 4.3.0-rc1 - i.e. current Linus tree. > > Submitting 300+ patches separately would amount to spamming, > instead I encourage people to take a look at the patches > on the Web: > > http://busybox.net/~vda/inline_hunt/4.3.0-rc1/ Looking over the drivers/tty/* patches, all of the patches that save 300+ and 1000+ look ok to me, so if you want to send those as a series (to the tty maintainers), I'll be happy to mark them reviewed. Wrt the "saves 100+' patches, some are ok, some are not, and some I'd like to eliminate in a different way. If you want to send those as a separate series, I could mark as reviewed the ok patches, indicate which ones to drop and which patches I'd be willing to rework. Regards, Peter Hurley