From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.182.105.169 with SMTP id gn9csp1810856obb; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.233.196 with SMTP id e187mr51439284qhc.86.1445965177018; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:59:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s93si37918307qgs.72.2015.10.27.09.59.36 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 09:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jsnow@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.183.28; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jsnow@redhat.com designates 209.132.183.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jsnow@redhat.com Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59590C0A147D; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 16:59:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scv.usersys.redhat.com (dhcp-17-163.bos.redhat.com [10.18.17.163]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t9RGxZac026609; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:59:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: new qemu-arm mailing list To: Peter Maydell , Pavel Fedin References: <012d01d110a7$b1915690$14b403b0$@samsung.com> Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Peter Crosthwaite , =?UTF-8?Q?Alex_Benn=c3=a9e?= , QEMU Developers , Paolo Bonzini From: John Snow Message-ID: <562FAD77.6060704@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:59:35 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27 X-TUID: BDH9gSUZEL28 On 10/27/2015 07:16 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 October 2015 at 11:07, Pavel Fedin wrote: >>> (Everything should still be cc'd to qemu-devel as well.) >> >> I would drop this requirement, except for stuff which could touch >> core functionality (qom, qobject). > > This is a standard requirement for all our sub-mailing lists -- > not everybody is subscribed to all of them, and it is useful > to be able to get an overview of everything going on by > subscribing to a single mailing list. > > thanks > -- PMM > Just to jump on and bead a dead horse, I am not OK with the idea of a mailing list where patches might get reviewed and staged for pull without the general population of qemu-devel being able to look first. I don't want to have to scan the [PULL] tag hoping to catch things of interest to me that were reviewed on opaque-to-me sub-mailing lists. --js