From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] xen/common: sched: Avoid to shadow the variable "cur" in runq_tickle Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:00:27 +0000 Message-ID: <562FADAB.2010404@citrix.com> References: <1445960359-17217-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <1445960359-17217-6-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <562FB40702000078000AF463@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Zr7dN-0002Ay-Hc for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:02:05 +0000 In-Reply-To: <562FB40702000078000AF463@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: George Dunlap , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Dario Faggioli List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 27/10/15 16:27, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 27.10.15 at 16:39, wrote: >> The variable "cur" is declared twice within "cur". However the top >> declaration could be re-used avoiding re-declaring another time the >> variable. > > I suppose the second "cur" was meant to be "runq_tickle()". Yes. Regards, -- Julien Grall