From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
toke@redhat.com, martin.lau@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
wutengda@huaweicloud.com, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcase for updating attached freplace prog to prog_array map
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:38:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <562a4618-1f4e-4f1d-a0e4-7a3c52307100@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240726153952.76914-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
On 7/26/24 8:39 AM, Leon Hwang wrote:
> Add a selftest to confirm the issue, which gets -EINVAL when update
> attached freplace prog to prog_array map, has been fixed.
>
> cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf; ./test_progs -t tailcalls
> 327/25 tailcalls/tailcall_freplace:OK
> 327 tailcalls:OK
> Summary: 1/25 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
LGTM with some comments below.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++-
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_freplace.c | 25 +++++++
> .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c | 21 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_freplace.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
> index e01fabb8cc415..21c5a37846ade 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c
> @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
> #include "tailcall_poke.skel.h"
> #include "tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy2.skel.h"
> #include "tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy3.skel.h"
> -
> +#include "tailcall_freplace.skel.h"
> +#include "tc_bpf2bpf.skel.h"
>
> /* test_tailcall_1 checks basic functionality by patching multiple locations
> * in a single program for a single tail call slot with nop->jmp, jmp->nop
> @@ -1495,6 +1496,66 @@ static void test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_3(void)
> RUN_TESTS(tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy3);
> }
>
> +/* test_tailcall_freplace checks that the attached freplace prog is OK to
> + * update the prog_array map.
> + */
> +static void test_tailcall_freplace(void)
> +{
> + struct tailcall_freplace *freplace_skel = NULL;
> + struct bpf_link *freplace_link = NULL;
> + struct bpf_program *freplace_prog;
> + struct tc_bpf2bpf *tc_skel = NULL;
> + int prog_fd, map_fd;
> + char buff[128] = {};
> + int err, key;
> +
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
> + .data_in = buff,
> + .data_size_in = sizeof(buff),
> + .repeat = 1,
> + );
> +
> + freplace_skel = tailcall_freplace__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(freplace_skel, "tailcall_freplace__open"))
> + return;
> +
> + tc_skel = tc_bpf2bpf__open_and_load();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tc_skel, "tc_bpf2bpf__open_and_load"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(tc_skel->progs.entry_tc);
> + freplace_prog = freplace_skel->progs.entry_freplace;
> + err = bpf_program__set_attach_target(freplace_prog, prog_fd, "subprog");
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "set_attach_target"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = tailcall_freplace__load(freplace_skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "tailcall_freplace__load"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + freplace_link = bpf_program__attach_freplace(freplace_prog, prog_fd,
> + "subprog");
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(freplace_link, "attach_freplace"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + map_fd = bpf_map__fd(freplace_skel->maps.jmp_table);
> + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(freplace_prog);
> + key = 0;
> + err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key, &prog_fd, BPF_ANY);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "update jmp_table"))
> + goto out;
> +
> + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(tc_skel->progs.entry_tc);
> + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
> + ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
> + ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 34, "test_run retval");
> +
> +out:
> + bpf_link__destroy(freplace_link);
> + tc_bpf2bpf__destroy(tc_skel);
> + tailcall_freplace__destroy(freplace_skel);
> +}
> +
> void test_tailcalls(void)
> {
> if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_1"))
> @@ -1543,4 +1604,6 @@ void test_tailcalls(void)
> test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_fentry_entry();
> test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_2();
> test_tailcall_bpf2bpf_hierarchy_3();
> + if (test__start_subtest("tailcall_freplace"))
> + test_tailcall_freplace();
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_freplace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_freplace.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..2966efc06ae8f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_freplace.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +
> +struct {
> + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY);
> + __uint(max_entries, 1);
> + __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32));
> + __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32));
> +} jmp_table SEC(".maps");
> +
> +int count = 0;
> +
> +SEC("freplace")
> +int entry_freplace(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + count++;
> +
remove empty line here.
> + bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 0);
> +
remove empty line here.
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..980bb810b481c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tc_bpf2bpf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +
> +__noinline
> +int subprog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + volatile int ret = 1;
> +
remove empty line here.
> + asm volatile (""::"r+"(ret));
remove above 'volatile' key word and replace asm volatile with __sink(ret).
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("tc")
> +int entry_tc(struct __sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + return subprog(skb);
> +}
> +
> +char __license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-26 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-26 15:39 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Fix updating attached freplace prog to prog_array map Leon Hwang
2024-07-26 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] " Leon Hwang
2024-07-26 19:34 ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-26 15:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add testcase for " Leon Hwang
2024-07-26 19:38 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2024-07-27 3:28 ` Leon Hwang
2024-07-27 3:39 ` Yonghong Song
2024-07-26 19:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Fix " Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=562a4618-1f4e-4f1d-a0e4-7a3c52307100@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.