Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] clk: Broadcom BCM63138 support

[Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>]

On 27/10/15 14:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/26, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patch series adds support for the Broadcom BCM63138 DSL SoCs
>> clocking framework.
>>
>> Since the HW is identical to the one found in Broadcom iProc SoCs, but the
>> integration is different (obviously), there is still a new compatible string
>> introduced just in case we happen to find issues in the future.
>>
>> This applies on top of clk/next as of
>> 679c51cffc3b316bd89ecc91ef92603dd6d4fc68 ("clk: Add stubs for of_clk_*() APIs when CONFIG_OF=n")
>>
>> Since there is an obvious dependency between patch 2 and 3, we can either
>> merge this through the Clock tree or via a future arm-soc pull requests
>> for Broadcom SoCs.
> 
> One way to avoid the dependency would be to stage the first two
> patches in clk tree under clk-bcm63xxx and then pull that into
> your local branch via git FETCH && git checkout FETCH_HEAD and
> then apply the 3rd patch on top, tag it and send it off to
> arm-soc. This way, when arm-soc merges into linus' tree the
> dependency is taken care of and we don't take anything for dtsi
> files through the clk tree. It looks like nothing bad will happen
> if patch 2 is merged before patch 3.

Works for me, thanks!
-- 
Florian