From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Leonid Bloch <leonid.bloch@ravellosystems.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry@daynix.com>,
Leonid Bloch <leonid@daynix.com>,
Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce Intel 82574 GbE Controller Emulation (e1000e)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 13:44:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563060C1.7030209@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445792408-28571-1-git-send-email-leonid.bloch@ravellosystems.com>
On 10/26/2015 01:00 AM, Leonid Bloch wrote:
> Hello qemu-devel,
>
> This patch series is an RFC for the new networking device emulation
> we're developing for QEMU.
>
> This new device emulates the Intel 82574 GbE Controller and works
> with unmodified Intel e1000e drivers from the Linux/Windows kernels.
>
> The status of the current series is "Functional Device Ready, work
> on Extended Features in Progress".
>
> More precisely, these patches represent a functional device, which
> is recognized by the standard Intel drivers, and is able to transfer
> TX/RX packets with CSO/TSO offloads, according to the spec.
>
> Extended features not supported yet (work in progress):
> 1. TX/RX Interrupt moderation mechanisms
> 2. RSS
> 3. Full-featured multi-queue (use of multiqueued network backend)
>
> Also, there will be some code refactoring and performance
> optimization efforts.
>
> This series was tested on Linux (Fedora 22) and Windows (2012R2)
> guests, using Iperf, with TX/RX and TCP/UDP streams, and various
> packet sizes.
>
> More thorough testing, including data streams with different MTU
> sizes, and Microsoft Certification (HLK) tests, are pending missing
> features' development.
>
> See commit messages (esp. "net: Introduce e1000e device emulation")
> for more information about the development approaches and the
> architecture options chosen for this device.
>
> This series is based upon v2.3.0 tag of the upstream QEMU repository,
> and it will be rebased to latest before the final submission.
>
> Please share your thoughts - any feedback is highly welcomed :)
>
> Best Regards,
> Dmitry Fleytman.
Thanks for the series. Will go through this in next few days.
Since 2.5 is in soft freeze, this looks a 2.6 material.
>
> Dmitry Fleytman (5):
> net: Add macros for ETH address tracing
> net_pkt: Name vmxnet3 packet abstractions more generic
> net_pkt: Extend packet abstraction as requied by e1000e functionality
> e1000_regs: Add definitions for Intel 82574-specific bits
> net: Introduce e1000e device emulation
>
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +
> default-configs/pci.mak | 1 +
> hw/net/Makefile.objs | 5 +-
> hw/net/e1000_regs.h | 201 ++++-
> hw/net/e1000e.c | 531 ++++++++++++
> hw/net/e1000e_core.c | 2081 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/net/e1000e_core.h | 181 +++++
> hw/net/net_rx_pkt.c | 273 +++++++
> hw/net/net_rx_pkt.h | 241 ++++++
> hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c | 606 ++++++++++++++
> hw/net/net_tx_pkt.h | 191 +++++
> hw/net/vmxnet3.c | 80 +-
> hw/net/vmxnet_rx_pkt.c | 187 -----
> hw/net/vmxnet_rx_pkt.h | 174 ----
> hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.c | 567 -------------
> hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.h | 148 ----
> include/net/eth.h | 90 +-
> include/net/net.h | 5 +
> net/eth.c | 152 +++-
> tests/Makefile | 4 +-
> trace-events | 68 ++
> 21 files changed, 4597 insertions(+), 1191 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 hw/net/e1000e.c
> create mode 100644 hw/net/e1000e_core.c
> create mode 100644 hw/net/e1000e_core.h
> create mode 100644 hw/net/net_rx_pkt.c
> create mode 100644 hw/net/net_rx_pkt.h
> create mode 100644 hw/net/net_tx_pkt.c
> create mode 100644 hw/net/net_tx_pkt.h
> delete mode 100644 hw/net/vmxnet_rx_pkt.c
> delete mode 100644 hw/net/vmxnet_rx_pkt.h
> delete mode 100644 hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.c
> delete mode 100644 hw/net/vmxnet_tx_pkt.h
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-28 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-25 17:00 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce Intel 82574 GbE Controller Emulation (e1000e) Leonid Bloch
2015-10-25 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/5] net: Add macros for ETH address tracing Leonid Bloch
2015-10-25 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/5] net_pkt: Name vmxnet3 packet abstractions more generic Leonid Bloch
2015-10-25 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/5] net_pkt: Extend packet abstraction as requied by e1000e functionality Leonid Bloch
2015-10-25 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/5] e1000_regs: Add definitions for Intel 82574-specific bits Leonid Bloch
2015-10-25 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 5/5] net: Introduce e1000e device emulation Leonid Bloch
2015-10-28 5:44 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-10-28 6:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/5] Introduce Intel 82574 GbE Controller Emulation (e1000e) Dmitry Fleytman
2015-10-30 5:28 ` Jason Wang
2015-10-31 5:52 ` Dmitry Fleytman
2015-11-02 3:35 ` Jason Wang
2015-11-02 7:49 ` Dmitry Fleytman
2015-11-03 5:44 ` Jason Wang
2015-11-03 9:17 ` Dmitry Fleytman
2016-01-13 4:43 ` Prem Mallappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563060C1.7030209@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry@daynix.com \
--cc=leonid.bloch@ravellosystems.com \
--cc=leonid@daynix.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shmulik.ladkani@ravellosystems.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.