From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
To: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>,
Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: 'Kukjin Kim' <kgene@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: dts: Add SROMc to Exynos 5410
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:36:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56309704.90904@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563095BE.9050106@samsung.com>
On 28.10.2015 18:30, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wednesday 28 October 2015 12:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28.10.2015 16:06, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>>>> + sromc: sromc@12250000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos-srom";
>>>>> + reg = <0x12250000 0x10>;
>>>>
>>>> Isn't 0x10 too small (SROM_BC3 won't be mapped)?
>>>
>>> Muhaha, indeed, thanks for noticing this.
>>> By the way, i've just checked exynos4.dtsi and exynos5.dtsi, they
>>> specify the same size. Did reviewers overlook this small thing?
>>
>> Yep, I pointed that 0x100 (from first version of patchset) is too big...
>> but did not exactly check the length of new value.
>>
>
> Yes, once you pointed out I checked UM for Exynos4415, Exynos5250,
> Exynos5420 and Exynos5410 and all these manuals talks about SROM_BC{0-3}
> only. There is no offset such as SROM_BC{4,5} at least in these SoC
> manuals. Accordingly I modified size from 0x100 to 0x10. But looks like
> I missed to remove SROM_BC{{4,5} from exynos-srom.h. I checked only
> these registers are used in the driver, so as such it should not cause
> any issue in driver as of now, only we have some redundant entry in
> exynos-srom.h which can be removed if it's not applicable for any of
> Exynos SoC, after confirmation from Kukjin.
I was not referring to SROM_BC[45] but to SROM_BC3 which has the offset
of 0x10.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: dts: Add SROMc to Exynos 5410
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:36:04 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56309704.90904@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563095BE.9050106@samsung.com>
On 28.10.2015 18:30, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wednesday 28 October 2015 12:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28.10.2015 16:06, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>>>> + sromc: sromc at 12250000 {
>>>>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos-srom";
>>>>> + reg = <0x12250000 0x10>;
>>>>
>>>> Isn't 0x10 too small (SROM_BC3 won't be mapped)?
>>>
>>> Muhaha, indeed, thanks for noticing this.
>>> By the way, i've just checked exynos4.dtsi and exynos5.dtsi, they
>>> specify the same size. Did reviewers overlook this small thing?
>>
>> Yep, I pointed that 0x100 (from first version of patchset) is too big...
>> but did not exactly check the length of new value.
>>
>
> Yes, once you pointed out I checked UM for Exynos4415, Exynos5250,
> Exynos5420 and Exynos5410 and all these manuals talks about SROM_BC{0-3}
> only. There is no offset such as SROM_BC{4,5} at least in these SoC
> manuals. Accordingly I modified size from 0x100 to 0x10. But looks like
> I missed to remove SROM_BC{{4,5} from exynos-srom.h. I checked only
> these registers are used in the driver, so as such it should not cause
> any issue in driver as of now, only we have some redundant entry in
> exynos-srom.h which can be removed if it's not applicable for any of
> Exynos SoC, after confirmation from Kukjin.
I was not referring to SROM_BC[45] but to SROM_BC3 which has the offset
of 0x10.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-28 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-27 8:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410 Pavel Fedin
2015-10-27 8:43 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-27 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: dts: Add SROMc to Exynos 5410 Pavel Fedin
2015-10-27 8:43 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-28 2:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 2:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 7:06 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-28 7:06 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-28 7:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 7:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 7:25 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-28 7:25 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-28 9:30 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-28 9:30 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-10-28 9:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2015-10-28 9:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 9:39 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-28 9:39 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-27 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] drivers: exynos-srom: Add support for bank configuration Pavel Fedin
2015-10-27 8:43 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-27 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM: dts: Add Ethernet chip to SMDK5410 Pavel Fedin
2015-10-27 8:43 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-27 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] Documentation: dt-bindings: Describe SROMc configuration Pavel Fedin
2015-10-27 8:43 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-10-28 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-10-28 1:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56309704.90904@samsung.com \
--to=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
--cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.