From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DBC755F4 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:54:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2015 03:54:33 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,209,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="821337366" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Oct 2015 03:54:33 -0700 Message-ID: <5630A999.1030605@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 12:55:21 +0200 From: Alexander Kanavin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <484dd4883f19d258e29e343f1b0735d2940d7424.1446009435.git.kai.kang@windriver.com> <56309F82.203@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <56309F82.203@windriver.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] libxml2: fix unsafe memory access X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:54:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/28/2015 12:12 PM, Kang Kai wrote: >> This may be a nitpick but I don't think DV has taken this patch in the >> six months it's been available so it's not a backport. > > I suppose Backport is the best choice in upstream status [ Pending > Submitted Accepted Backport Denied Inappropriate ]. Though it is not > from official upstream, it is from somewhere else as listed in the patch. 'Submitted [where]' is the right choice here, I think. Alex