From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Schuberth Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clone: Allow an explicit argument for parallel submodule clones Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 22:03:46 +0100 Message-ID: <56313832.4000002@gmail.com> References: <1445625879-30330-1-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> <1445625879-30330-4-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jrnieder@gmail.com, Jens.Lehmann@web.de To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 28 22:04:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrXtC-0004F6-0S for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 22:04:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932454AbbJ1VEF (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:04:05 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48117 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932442AbbJ1VEE (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 17:04:04 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZrXt3-00048S-9g for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 22:04:01 +0100 Received: from p548d6c52.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.141.108.82]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 22:04:01 +0100 Received: from sschuberth by p548d6c52.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 22:04:01 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p548d6c52.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 In-Reply-To: <1445625879-30330-4-git-send-email-sbeller@google.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 23.10.2015 20:44, Stefan Beller wrote: > [...] which may pick reasonable > defaults if you don't specify an explicit number. IMO the above should also be mentioned ini the docs: > +-j:: > +--jobs:: > + The number of submodules fetched at the same time. Otherwise, from reading the docs, my immediate question would be "What's the default for n if not specified?" -- Sebastian Schuberth