From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.182.105.169 with SMTP id gn9csp273568obb; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:51:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.102.101 with SMTP id fn5mr37420961pab.111.1446090718440; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com. [58.251.152.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ea2si75212852pbc.135.2015.10.28.20.51.57 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Oct 2015 20:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of zhaoshenglong@huawei.com designates 58.251.152.64 as permitted sender) client-ip=58.251.152.64; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of zhaoshenglong@huawei.com designates 58.251.152.64 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com Received: from 172.24.1.49 (EHLO szxeml426-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.49]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CYA80740; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:51:52 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.16.142) by szxeml426-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:51:48 +0800 Message-ID: <563197D3.5050206@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 11:51:47 +0800 From: Shannon Zhao User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Peter Maydell CC: Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_Benn=E9e?= , QEMU Developers Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: new qemu-arm mailing list References: <20151027110233.GE18847@toto> In-Reply-To: <20151027110233.GE18847@toto> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.16.142] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-TUID: tTnluvuLxh8l On 2015/10/27 19:02, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:15:32AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Hi; it's been suggested to me that it would be helpful to have a >> qemu-arm mailing list, along the lines of the existing qemu-ppc >> and qemu-block lists. The idea would be to get people to cc the >> list with their ARM related patches, so it would mostly act as >> a way for people to filter their mail to separate the ARM stuff >> out from the qemu-devel firehose. (Everything should still be >> cc'd to qemu-devel as well.) >> >> Any objections/opinions? >> > > Sounds good to me! > +1 -- Shannon