All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>, Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: Allow barrier_all_devices to do per-chunk device check
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:41:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56335761.4080104@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56332B3A.3080703@oracle.com>



在 2015年10月30日 16:32, Anand Jain 写道:
>
>
> Qu,
>
>   We shouldn't mark FS readonly when chunks are degradable.
>   As below.
>
> Thanks, Anand
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 39a2d57..dbb2483 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -3530,7 +3530,7 @@ static int write_all_supers(struct btrfs_root
> *root, int max_mirrors)
>
>          if (do_barriers) {
>                  ret = barrier_all_devices(root->fs_info);
> -               if (ret) {
> +               if (ret < 0) {
>                          mutex_unlock(
>
> &root->fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
>                          btrfs_std_error(root->fs_info, ret,
>
>

Sorry, I didn't got the point here.

There should be no difference between ret and ret < 0,
as barrier_all_devices() will only return -EIO or 0.

Or I missed something?

Thanks,
Qu

>
>
> On 09/21/2015 10:10 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> The last user of num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures is
>> barrier_all_devices().
>> But it's can be easily changed to new per-chunk degradable check
>> framework.
>>
>> Now btrfs_device will have two extra members, representing send/wait
>> error, set at write_dev_flush() time.
>> And then check it in a similar but more accurate behavior than old code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 13 +++++--------
>>   fs/btrfs/volumes.c |  6 +++++-
>>   fs/btrfs/volumes.h |  4 ++++
>>   3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> index d64299f..7cd94e7 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
>> @@ -3400,8 +3400,6 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct
>> btrfs_fs_info *info)
>>   {
>>       struct list_head *head;
>>       struct btrfs_device *dev;
>> -    int errors_send = 0;
>> -    int errors_wait = 0;
>>       int ret;
>>
>>       /* send down all the barriers */
>> @@ -3410,7 +3408,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct
>> btrfs_fs_info *info)
>>           if (dev->missing)
>>               continue;
>>           if (!dev->bdev) {
>> -            errors_send++;
>> +            dev->err_send = 1;
>>               continue;
>>           }
>>           if (!dev->in_fs_metadata || !dev->writeable)
>> @@ -3418,7 +3416,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct
>> btrfs_fs_info *info)
>>
>>           ret = write_dev_flush(dev, 0);
>>           if (ret)
>> -            errors_send++;
>> +            dev->err_send = 1;
>>       }
>>
>>       /* wait for all the barriers */
>> @@ -3426,7 +3424,7 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct
>> btrfs_fs_info *info)
>>           if (dev->missing)
>>               continue;
>>           if (!dev->bdev) {
>> -            errors_wait++;
>> +            dev->err_wait = 1;
>>               continue;
>>           }
>>           if (!dev->in_fs_metadata || !dev->writeable)
>> @@ -3434,10 +3432,9 @@ static int barrier_all_devices(struct
>> btrfs_fs_info *info)
>>
>>           ret = write_dev_flush(dev, 1);
>>           if (ret)
>> -            errors_wait++;
>> +            dev->err_wait = 1;
>>       }
>> -    if (errors_send > info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures ||
>> -        errors_wait > info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures)
>> +    if (btrfs_check_degradable(info, info->sb->s_flags) < 0)
>>           return -EIO;
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> index f1ef215..88266fa 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> @@ -6945,8 +6945,12 @@ int btrfs_check_degradable(struct btrfs_fs_info
>> *fs_info, unsigned flags)
>>               btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(
>>                       map->type);
>>           for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
>> -            if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing)
>> +            if (map->stripes[i].dev->missing ||
>> +                map->stripes[i].dev->err_wait ||
>> +                map->stripes[i].dev->err_send)
>>                   missing++;
>> +            map->stripes[i].dev->err_wait = 0;
>> +            map->stripes[i].dev->err_send = 0;
>>           }
>>           if (missing > max_tolerated) {
>>               ret = -EIO;
>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> index fe758df..cd02556 100644
>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.h
>> @@ -76,6 +76,10 @@ struct btrfs_device {
>>       int can_discard;
>>       int is_tgtdev_for_dev_replace;
>>
>> +    /* for barrier_all_devices() check */
>> +    int err_send;
>> +    int err_wait;
>> +
>>   #ifdef __BTRFS_NEED_DEVICE_DATA_ORDERED
>>       seqcount_t data_seqcount;
>>   #endif
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-30 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-21  2:10 [PATCH 0/5] Btrfs: Per-chunk degradable check Qu Wenruo
2015-09-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] btrfs: Introduce a new function to check if all chunks a OK for degraded mount Qu Wenruo
2016-04-18  8:47   ` [PATCH] btrfs: fix btrfs_check_degradable() to free extent map Anand Jain
2015-09-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] btrfs: Do per-chunk check for mount time check Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25  7:05   ` Anand Jain
2015-09-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] btrfs: Do per-chunk degraded check for remount Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25  6:54   ` Anand Jain
2015-09-25  8:08     ` Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25  8:30       ` Anand Jain
2015-09-25  8:34         ` Qu Wenruo
2015-09-25  8:24   ` [PATCH 1/1] " Anand Jain
2015-09-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] btrfs: Allow barrier_all_devices to do per-chunk device check Qu Wenruo
2015-10-30  8:32   ` Anand Jain
2015-10-30 11:41     ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2015-10-30 23:52       ` Anand Jain
2015-09-21  2:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] btrfs: Cleanup num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures Qu Wenruo
2015-11-05  0:57 ` [PATCH 0/5] Btrfs: Per-chunk degradable check Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56335761.4080104@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.