From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 17:52:25 +0100
Subject: [Cocci] Release 1.0.3: Clarification around SmPL conjunctions
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1510301705060.2364@hadrien>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1510262151580.2079@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <5631F344.9080804@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1510301405330.2364@hadrien>
 <56337A59.8030804@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1510301535230.2364@hadrien>
 <563383DF.9000509@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1510301606020.2364@hadrien>
 <56338C69.3030401@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1510301643040.2364@hadrien>
 <563390EE.1000306@users.sourceforge.net>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1510301705060.2364@hadrien>
Message-ID: <5633A049.9090801@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

> demos/conjunction.c is only intended for use with demos/conjunction.cocci,
> which doesn't care at all about the name of the containing function.

Will this source code example become a bit easier to understand
if one of the test functions will be renamed so that the names are unique?

Regards,
Markus