From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: Change locking for struct_mutex, v2.
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:55:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56376B5B.7090900@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151102130623.GO2014@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
Op 02-11-15 om 14:06 schreef Chris Wilson:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 01:57:59PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> struct_mutex is being locked for every plane in intel_prepare_plane_fb and
>> intel_cleanup_plane_fb. This can be optimized by acquiring struct_mutex first
>> before calling the atomic helpers. This way the lock only needs to be acquired
>> twice in ->atomic_commit(). Once for pinning new framebuffers at the start,
>> the second time for unpinning old framebuffer.
> A little explanation that you move the locking into the caller would
> help clarify the patch.
>
>> @@ -13453,10 +13461,6 @@ intel_prepare_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
>> @@ -13520,7 +13521,6 @@ intel_cleanup_plane_fb(struct drm_plane *plane,
> Please document that you now expect both of these functions to be called
> with struct_mutex held. Also is there any opportunity to reduce the
> struct_mutex lock time?
>
Patch 5/5 reduces locking time. It moves most waiting out of struct_mutex except for the full idle during modesets. :)
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-02 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 11:27 [PATCH 0/5] drm/i915: Interruptible framebuffer pinning Maarten Lankhorst
2015-09-23 11:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Make plane fb tracking work correctly, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-14 12:59 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-14 13:54 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-09-23 11:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Make prepare_plane_fb fully interruptible Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-16 11:21 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-19 9:39 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-23 11:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Make wait_for_flips interruptible Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-19 13:16 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-19 13:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-20 7:38 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-20 8:10 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-20 13:07 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-19 14:38 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-19 15:09 ` [PATCH 2.9/5] drm/i915: Do not wait for flips in intel_crtc_disable_noatomic Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-20 12:56 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2015-10-20 18:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-09-23 11:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Change locking for struct_mutex Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-28 22:48 ` Matt Roper
2015-11-02 12:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: Change locking for struct_mutex, v2 Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-02 13:06 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-02 13:55 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2015-09-23 11:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Wait for object idle without locks in atomic_commit Maarten Lankhorst
2015-10-29 0:30 ` Matt Roper
2015-11-02 13:13 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-02 13:46 ` Chris Wilson
2015-11-02 13:53 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2015-11-02 13:58 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56376B5B.7090900@linux.intel.com \
--to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.