From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtbPy-0001RC-MT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:14:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtbPt-0006ZG-Gb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:14:30 -0500 Received: from smtp.ispras.ru ([83.149.199.79]:44736) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZtbPt-0006YD-9y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2015 08:14:25 -0500 References: <7cd03581b882e28ef904a35a4ce1e374@ispras.ru> <55E859BA.8080502@ispras.ru> <55E93C0E.4000401@ispras.ru> <55E9C90E.8020408@ispras.ru> <55FB3881.5070608@codeaurora.org> <55FBC817.4040706@ispras.ru> <55FC1F18.8040009@codeaurora.org> From: Sergey Smolov Message-ID: <5638A550.6020100@ispras.ru> Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:15:12 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55FC1F18.8040009@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU+Aarch64: in_asm log skips instructions of loop-programs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christopher Covington Cc: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers , Richard Henderson Hi Christopher, I've send my patch to the mailing list. Sorry for the great delay in=20 answers. 18.09.2015 18:26, Christopher Covington =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On 09/18/2015 04:15 AM, Sergey Smolov wrote: >> Hi Christopher, >> >> 18.09.2015 02:02, Christopher Covington =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82= : >>> Hi Sergey, >>> >>> On 09/04/2015 12:38 PM, Sergey Smolov wrote: >>>>> 03.09.2015 19:35, Peter Maydell =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >>>>>> On 3 September 2015 at 15:31, Sergey Smolov wro= te: >>>>>>> Do you think it is possible to implement another QEMU logger whic= h will >>>>>>> make a record for every executed block, >>>>>> Yes (this would just need to disable the TB linking optimisation, >>>>>> which we've discussed providing a debug toggle for in another >>>>>> thread). >>>> Ok, I've implemented a mapping between disassembled forms of instruc= tions and >>>> executed TBs. >>>> Now my logger does "loop unrolling" successfully. >>> This sounds like it solves the same issue as -d nochain but in what's= probably >>> a more time efficient manner. Are you able to share your implementati= on? >> In which way should I share it? Am I need to create a patch and send i= t to >> mailing list? > That would be ideal. If you're not familiar with the process, just let = me know > and I'd be happy to help. > > Thanks, > Christopher Covington >