From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Turmel Subject: Re: Advice requested Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 13:02:23 -0500 Message-ID: <5638F6AF.7020501@turmel.org> References: <56367C33.6060703@turmel.org> <5637842D.1070000@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5637842D.1070000@turmel.org> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: o1bigtenor , Linux-RAID List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 11/02/2015 10:41 AM, Phil Turmel wrote: > Good morning Dee, > > { Added linux-raid back -- convention on kernel.org is reply-to-all } The next exchange in this thread were too large to make it past the kernel.org size limits. They contain all of the off-list traffic the Dee had in his archive and my responses to it. I've archived these two mails myself for public benefit -- they were intended to be public after all. http://www.turmel.org/other/Advice-requested-201511021821.eml http://www.turmel.org/other/Advice-requested-201511021943.eml There's a few lessons here: 1) Insist on staying on-list. Dee's help drifted away when the problems weren't solved. No-one else saw the traffic, so could not step in. 2) Trim replies. :-) Good G*d, these were hard to read without missing details. 3) Persevere. Phil