From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 33EDDE00AB9; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 02:02:57 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (scerveau[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.212.169 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A3BE00AAA for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 02:02:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so28508548wic.1 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 02:02:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2oAPszpLsbq9K/whZR77P3PDbmhcBCAcoeUZdR7d/KI=; b=LxEOCdTi4rbdGIF6fulyUyKTt+3iGaPvYHLEvjALq1mm68AjVhbhc/2anWYkgV9GY8 PGZuD9VcRxmFF5Bz3qyaME0oC/hGqt3jbmigXM17lShy4RiRPc+wr/wqvCGbjc1iQJ/W mgfNyo1yAWxID/MqMKrymg+5axV/NmdkZsfH+wghqyvMoiNhmgLlKpSMv0le2fB20NA1 R0a4tdnQ2AMM8PH88u2ey2TWxMALaicHCnB6LIRVbZVZ82bPYOh8TYsmdJk122R2d6YF v5J6sr8WKawpytw075tgAraGGdMLlNxdG5b+Lg+QJP/Nkk1hmrzj5FsHERbzR7Cpa/AH xpfg== X-Received: by 10.194.205.130 with SMTP id lg2mr814802wjc.9.1446631372454; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 02:02:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.24.63.46] (connected-labs-gw1.ter2.neodc.mpl.cust.as8218.eu. [94.103.137.126]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id at4sm744755wjc.9.2015.11.04.02.02.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2015 02:02:51 -0800 (PST) To: yocto@yoctoproject.org From: scerveau Message-ID: <5639D7CA.7080404@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:02:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dizzy branch] License list fails with rpm with package shared between two arch X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:02:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all, I'm having a machine A and a machine B. This two machines are built against the same image class and in the same build folder. But on machine A there is a recipe LAMBDA which is not include in machine B. The package LAMBDA is shared in the same folder cortexa9hf_vfp_neon....(Machine A and B use the same imx arch) If i build machine A(everything is ok) and then machine B, during the last recipe execution image rootfs of machine B, a list of package is performed to build the license list with this missing package which finally fails saying that license folder does not exist. I guess the rpm package list performed in poky/lib/oe/package_manager.py is not correct and should be done according to the image instead of the list of files in the folder cortexa9hf_vfp_neon. I found a hack by putting my recipe LAMBDA dependent to my machine so the package is not in cortexa9hf_vfp_neon anymore. If someone could help me on this issue, it would be very nice because i guess there is something wrong in yocto base tools. BR. Stephane