From: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
To: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>,
selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Subject: Re: selinux-testsuite: mmap execmod test failure on RHEL6.7 s390x
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:21:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563A5AAB.5000802@tycho.nsa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1451625304.2912505.1446655745278.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On 11/04/2015 11:49 AM, Jan Stancek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing one of mmap tests failing on RHEL6.7. Strange is that it
> fails only on s390x, all other arches are PASSing.
>
> setsebool allow_execmod is set to "0"
> Running as user root with context unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:
>
> domain_trans/test ....... ok
> entrypoint/test ......... ok
> execshare/test .......... ok
> exectrace/test .......... ok
> execute_no_trans/test ... ok
> fdreceive/test .......... ok
> inherit/test ............ ok
> link/test ............... ok
> mkdir/test .............. ok
> msg/test ................ ok
> open/test ............... ok
> ptrace/test ............. ok
> readlink/test ........... ok
> relabel/test ............ ok
> rename/test ............. ok
> rxdir/test .............. ok
> sem/test ................ ok
> setattr/test ............ ok
> setnice/test ............ ok
> shm/test ................ ok
> sigkill/test ............ ok
> stat/test ............... ok
> sysctl/test ............. ok
> task_create/test ........ ok
> task_setnice/test ....... ok
> task_setscheduler/test .. ok
> task_getscheduler/test .. ok
> task_getsid/test ........ ok
> task_getpgid/test ....... ok
> task_setpgid/test ....... ok
> wait/test ............... ok
> file/test ............... ok
> ioctl/test .............. ok
> capable_file/test ....... ok
> capable_net/test ........ ok
> capable_sys/test ........ ok
> dyntrace/test ........... ok
> dyntrans/test ........... ok
> bounds/test ............. ok
> mmap/test ............... 1/30 # Failed test 30 in mmap/test at line 105
> # mmap/test line 105 is: ok($result);
> mmap/test ............... Failed 1/30 subtests
> unix_socket/test ........ ok
> inet_socket/test ........ ok
>
>>From mmap/test - this test is expected to fail:
> $result = system "runcon -t test_no_execmod_t $basedir/mprotect_file_private_execmod $basedir/temp_file 2>&1";
> ok($result);
>
>>From strace.log:
> ...
> open("./temp_file", O_RDONLY) = 3
> mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x3fffd7c3000
> mprotect(0x3fffd7c3000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC) = 0
>
> I opened a BZ against RHEL6.7 selinux-policy:
> Bug 1278058 - s390x fails mmap execmod test
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278058
> but I'm not sure if it's the policy or the kernel. I couldn't find any
> execmod exceptions while grepping policy sources on "s390".
>
> Does anyone have any tips/hints how to debug this further?
selinux-testsuite exercises the individual kernel permission checks
using its own privately defined test domains and types, so a failure
indicates a kernel bug or a bug in the test policy or test code, not a
bug in the distribution policy package. It could be that a change in
the distribution policy has a side effect (e.g. allowing some permission
to all domains that we are trying to test such that we cannot trigger a
failure, as in this case), but the testsuite tries to work around such
cases by setting any necessary global booleans for the test duration
and/or custom defining the test domain in such a way that it does not
inherit anything from the distribution policy.
The exec* checks can be disabled on certain architectures if they
default to executable data but that would affect more than just execmod
(and s390 does not default to executable data).
Can you check that execmod permission is NOT granted to test_no_execmod_t:
$ sesearch -AC -s test_no_execmod_t -p execmod
Can you confirm that the test program is not marked with executable
stack flag:
$ execstack -q tests/mmap/mprotect_file_private_execmod
Otherwise, I think you need some kernel instrumentation / tracing to see
what is happening, particularly the selinux_file_mprotect() function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-04 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1722157580.2900002.1446655193117.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
2015-11-04 16:49 ` selinux-testsuite: mmap execmod test failure on RHEL6.7 s390x Jan Stancek
2015-11-04 19:21 ` Stephen Smalley [this message]
2015-11-04 20:32 ` Paul Moore
2015-11-04 20:49 ` Stephen Smalley
2015-11-04 21:51 ` Paul Moore
2015-11-05 13:27 ` Jan Stancek
2015-11-05 14:37 ` Stephen Smalley
2015-11-05 15:45 ` Jan Stancek
2015-11-05 16:01 ` Stephen Smalley
2015-11-05 16:14 ` Jan Stancek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563A5AAB.5000802@tycho.nsa.gov \
--to=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.