Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/7] e1000: Add support for migrating the entire MAC registers' array

[Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>]

On 11/04/2015 10:48 PM, Leonid Bloch wrote:
>>> >>      },
>>> >>      .subsections = (const VMStateDescription*[]) {
>>> >>          &vmstate_e1000_mit_state,
>>> >> +        &vmstate_e1000_full_mac_state,
>>> >> +        &vmstate_e1000_compat_mac_state,
>>> >>          NULL
>>> >>      }
>> >
>> > I'm afraid this will break migration to older qemu. Consider the case
>> > when full_mac_registers=off, we save compat mac registers as a
>> > subsection, this breaks the assumption on load who expect all compact
>> > registers just after phy_reg. (You can just test this with a simple
>> > 'savevm' with full_mac_register_off and the revert this patch and do a
>> > 'loadvm'), Looks like the safe way is to just add a
>> > vmstate_e1000_full_mac_state and keep other fields of vmstate_e1000
>> > unmodified.
> You are right! Thanks.
>> >
>>> >>  };
>>> >> @@ -1603,6 +1640,8 @@ static Property e1000_properties[] = {
>>> >>                      compat_flags, E1000_FLAG_AUTONEG_BIT, true),
>>> >>      DEFINE_PROP_BIT("mitigation", E1000State,
>>> >>                      compat_flags, E1000_FLAG_MIT_BIT, true),
>>> >> +    DEFINE_PROP_BIT("full_mac_registers", E1000State,
>>> >> +                    compat_flags, E1000_FLAG_MAC_BIT, true),
>>> >>      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
>>> >>  };
>>> >>
>> >
>> > Need also turn this off for pre 2.5 machines in HW_COMPAT_2_4.
> Thanks for reminding!
> BTW, HW_COMPAT is simply the new version of PC_COMPAT, or am I wrong?
>
> Leonid.
>

HW_COMPAT contains compatibility options that could be used by all
targets (e.g both ppc and x86). PC_COMPAT contains pc specific options.
So usually PC_COMPAT is a superset of HW_COMPAT.