Re: [PATCH v2] kni: Use utsrelease.h to determine Ubuntu kernel version

["Simon Kågström" <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net>]

On 2015-11-04 19:21, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:29:01 +0100
> Simon Kågström <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 2015-11-04 11:35, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 2015-08-20 08:51, Simon Kagstrom:
>>>> -ifeq ($(shell test -f /proc/version_signature && lsb_release -si 2>/dev/null),Ubuntu)
>>>> +ifeq ($(shell lsb_release -si 2>/dev/null),Ubuntu)
>>>>  MODULE_CFLAGS += -DUBUNTU_RELEASE_CODE=$(shell lsb_release -sr | tr -d .)
>>>> -UBUNTU_KERNEL_CODE := $(shell cut -d' ' -f2 /proc/version_signature | \
>>>> -                        cut -d'~' -f1 | cut -d- -f1,2 | tr .- $(comma))
>>>> +UBUNTU_KERNEL_CODE := $(shell echo `grep UTS_RELEASE $(RTE_KERNELDIR)/include/generated/utsrelease.h \
>>>> +	 | cut -d '"' -f2 | cut -d- -f1,2 | tr .- $(comma)`,1)
>>>>  MODULE_CFLAGS += -D"UBUNTU_KERNEL_CODE=UBUNTU_KERNEL_VERSION($(UBUNTU_KERNEL_CODE))"
>>>>  endif
>>>
>> So lsb_release will come from the chroot, as it should, but without the
>> patch, the kernel version will not come from the installed kernel
>> headers in the chroot, but the running kernel - which might even not be
>> Ubuntu.
> 
> The danger here is starting to assume the build machine is the same as the
> running image. Using /proc to determine runtime environment is wrong.

Exactly, and our build breaks because of this without the patch. So the
patch removes the check in /proc and instead takes the kernel version
from the kernel headers.

// Simon