From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, tklauser@distanz.ch
Subject: Re: AF_PACKET mmap() v4...
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:56:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563B5202.1020207@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446723516.4184.33.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On 11/05/2015 12:38 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 10:39 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 11/05/2015 10:07 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 05 November 2015 00:04:14 David Miller wrote:
>>>> As part of fixing y2038 problems, Arnd is going to have to make a new
>>>> version fo the AF_PACKET mmap() tpacker descriptors in order to extend
>>>> the time values to 64-bit.
>>>>
>>>> So I want everyone to think about whether there are any other changes
>>>> we might want to make given that we have to make a v4 anyways.
>>>>
>>>> Particularly, I am rather certain that the buffer management could be
>>>> improved. Some have complained that v3 is kinda awkward to use and/or
>>>> suboptimal is various ways.
>>>
>>> I have taken a closer look at the actual timestamp data now, and noticed
>>> that we use __u32 for both tp_sec and ts_sec in the user visible data.
>>> This means that once we fix the internal implementation to use 64-bit
>>> timestamps, we actually won't overflow until 2106 because the 2038 overflow
>>> is only for signed 32-bit numbers as we have in 'struct timespec'.
>>>
>>> So the good news is that we can keep the existing v1 through v3 formats
>>> beyond 2038, but only as long as all user space that cares about the
>>> value also interprets it as unsigned.
>>
>> Right, I was just about to ask that. So we could just make a union in
>> AF_PACKET's UAPI for a single 64-bit variable (as in ktime_t) to fix that.
>
> If I am not mistaken, af_packet also lacks the ability to properly set
> skb->protocol
>
> I noticed this using trafgen on a bonding device, when I did my SYNFLOOD
> tests for TCP listener rewrite.
>
> The bonding hash function might uses flow dissector, but as this flow
> dissection depends on skb->protocol, all the traffic is directed on a
> single slave.
Right, if I see this correctly, when you trigger the flushing of TX_RING
via sendmsg(), one can hand over a sockaddr_ll, where we infer sll_protocol
and tag every skb's skb->protocol with that in tpacket_fill_skb() for the
current flushing run. Otherwise, we use the po->num specified at socket
creation / bind time for everything (trafgen case).
If needed on a per skb basis, perhaps we could map some tpacket_hdr{,2}
member that is not used from TX_RING side (perhaps union on tp_snaplen)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-05 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-05 5:04 AF_PACKET mmap() v4 David Miller
2015-11-05 6:53 ` Richard Cochran
2015-11-05 8:14 ` Guy Harris
2015-11-05 15:32 ` David Miller
2015-11-05 9:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-05 9:39 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-05 11:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-11-05 12:56 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-11-05 16:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-11-05 22:56 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-06 11:34 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-08 2:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-11-08 4:27 ` John Fastabend
2015-11-09 10:54 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563B5202.1020207@iogearbox.net \
--to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tklauser@distanz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.