From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 3AE6AE00B44; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:02:58 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (k4230r6[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.212.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EADE00B3D for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 05:02:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so10056435wik.1 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 05:02:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bziNya2ne3KQrk+obDzCo7y+qMfgNq7guZ1O+Tr24uU=; b=aRIBilci4/f7lWJgelTmQEa81W2c43dw0CYf38Y0WonLgjL1pMAgoFR8iwlnJJZGmQ Tuj6ovaBif3tqI4AKOdBMcupt5d0Grseg6DBOVgdEeVEweXGuJPOChSC12a2CuFEeSjB PJCf+th23Kr2ooMmxX37D9NsyW27ZCEQbSxOGu2JCOJYmaVzWOZNAf5rbd5NI2eEkYBA /TV+Rk57ympBowBwVpbAv1mZRCNqqJbYCCAkN7UuiiO6/JItwo1kc6xY2lNQDCUUi159 9Jq+Y6ruLjeJdTyiE6JVZOCheZ/fT+OVw/Xs5PK0agawQvvENOBu0NWkZS3Cy5jzqgtD 5q0g== X-Received: by 10.194.232.230 with SMTP id tr6mr8583285wjc.21.1446728572735; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 05:02:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.23.113] (HSI-KBW-46-223-219-101.hsi.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de. [46.223.219.101]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e63sm34049011wma.7.2015.11.05.05.02.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Nov 2015 05:02:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <563B537B.3070404@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:02:51 +0100 From: Christian Ege User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: Adding a new machine to meta-fsl-arm-extra X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:02:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, I am preparing Patches for the UDOO Neo (http://www.udoo.org/udoo-neo/) i.mx6 SoloX based board to be integrated into meta-fsl-arm-extra. I have some questions what is the intended work flow for this. At the moment I have integrated the UDOO Neo board in my fork of meta-fsl-arm-extra. https://github.com/graugans/meta-fsl-arm-extra/tree/fido - Is it okay to provide patches for fido at first or should new boards be introduced to master only? - How to deal with the various flavours of the Neo Familiy? - BASIC with 512MB RAM, Ethernet - EXTENDED 1GB RAM, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, Motion Sensors - FULL 1GB RAM, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, Motion Sensors, Ethernet Should I provided 3 machine configs? - udooneofull - udooneobasic - udooneoextended Are there any suggestions on the naming scheme? As far as I know '-' is not an good idea as separator. I Have patches available for the UDOO Quad as-well but no board to test on. If there is interest I can provide them as-well. Regards, Christian