All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 11:29:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <563B83E9.60909@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151102164040.GV3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 11/02/2015 11:40 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 07:26:35PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> This patch enables the accumulation of kicking and waiting related
>> PV qspinlock statistics when the new QUEUED_LOCK_STAT configuration
>> option is selected. It also enables the collection of data which
>> enable us to calculate the kicking and wakeup latencies which have
>> a heavy dependency on the CPUs being used.
>>
>> The statistical counters are per-cpu variables to minimize the
>> performance overhead in their updates. These counters are exported
>> via the sysfs filesystem under the /sys/kernel/qlockstat directory.
>> When the corresponding sysfs files are read, summation and computing
>> of the required data are then performed.
> Why did you switch to sysfs? You can create custom debugfs files too.

I was not aware of that capability. So you mean using 
debugfs_create_file() using custom file_operations. Right? That doesn't 
seem to be easier than using sysfs. However, I can use that if you think 
it is better to use debugfs.

>
>> @@ -259,7 +275,7 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
>>   	if (READ_ONCE(pn->state) == vcpu_hashed)
>>   		lp = (struct qspinlock **)1;
>>
>> -	for (;;) {
>> +	for (;; waitcnt++) {
>>   		for (loop = SPIN_THRESHOLD; loop; loop--) {
>>   			if (!READ_ONCE(l->locked))
>>   				return;
> Did you check that goes away when !STAT ?

Yes, the increment code goes away when !STAT. I had added a comment to 
talk about that.

>
>> +/*
>> + * Return the average kick latency (ns) = pv_latency_kick/pv_kick_unlock
>> + */
>> +static ssize_t
>> +kick_latency_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> +{
>> +	int cpu;
>> +	u64 latencies = 0, kicks = 0;
>> +
>> +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> I think you need for_each_possible_cpu(), otherwise the results will
> change with hotplug operations.

Right, I will make the change.

Cheers,
Longman

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-05 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-30 23:26 [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 0/6] locking/qspinlock: Enhance pvqspinlock Waiman Long
2015-10-30 23:26 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 1/6] locking/qspinlock: Use _acquire/_release versions of cmpxchg & xchg Waiman Long
2015-10-30 23:26 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 2/6] locking/qspinlock: prefetch next node cacheline Waiman Long
2015-11-02 16:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-02 22:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 16:42       ` Waiman Long
2015-11-05 16:49         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 16:06     ` Waiman Long
2015-11-05 16:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 16:52         ` Waiman Long
2015-10-30 23:26 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 3/6] locking/pvqspinlock, x86: Optimize PV unlock code path Waiman Long
2015-10-30 23:26 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 4/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Collect slowpath lock statistics Waiman Long
2015-11-02 16:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 16:29     ` Waiman Long [this message]
2015-11-05 16:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 16:59         ` Waiman Long
2015-11-05 17:09           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-05 17:34             ` Waiman Long
2015-10-30 23:26 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long
2015-11-06 14:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-06 17:47     ` Waiman Long
2015-11-09 17:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-09 19:53         ` Waiman Long
2015-10-30 23:26 ` [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 6/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Waiman Long
2015-11-06 15:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-06 17:54     ` Waiman Long
2015-11-06 20:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-09 16:51         ` Waiman Long
2015-11-09 17:33           ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=563B83E9.60909@hpe.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.