All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ibmvscsi: Allow to configure maximum LUN
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:01:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <563BA7A1.8090104@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563B1899.6050308@suse.de>

On 11/05/2015 02:51 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 12:06 AM, Brian King wrote:
>> On 11/04/2015 07:02 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 11/04/2015 12:46 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 04/11/2015 12:16, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>>>> On 11/04/2015 11:20 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>>>> QEMU allows until 32 LUNs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c | 5 ++++-
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c
>>>>>> index 04de287..4480d3e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c
>>>>>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
>>>>>>   */
>>>>>>  static int max_id = 64;
>>>>>>  static int max_channel = 3;
>>>>>> +static int max_lun = 8;
>>>>>>  static int init_timeout = 300;
>>>>>>  static int login_timeout = 60;
>>>>>>  static int info_timeout = 30;
>>>>>> @@ -117,6 +118,8 @@ module_param_named(fast_fail, fast_fail, int, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>>>>>>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(fast_fail, "Enable fast fail. [Default=1]");
>>>>>>  module_param_named(client_reserve, client_reserve, int, S_IRUGO );
>>>>>>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(client_reserve, "Attempt client managed reserve/release");
>>>>>> +module_param(max_lun, int, S_IRUGO);
>>>>>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_lun, "Maximum LUN value [Default=8]");
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  static void ibmvscsi_handle_crq(struct viosrp_crq *crq,
>>>>>>  				struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata);
>>>>>> @@ -2289,7 +2292,7 @@ static int ibmvscsi_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev, const struct vio_device_id *id)
>>>>>>  		goto init_pool_failed;
>>>>>>  	}
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> -	host->max_lun = 8;
>>>>>> +	host->max_lun = max_lun;
>>>>>>  	host->max_id = max_id;
>>>>>>  	host->max_channel = max_channel;
>>>>>>  	host->max_cmd_len = 16;
>>>>>>
>>>>> Please, don't do this.
>>>>>
>>>>> 'max_lun' should only be set if the HBA / transport has some hard
>>>>> limitations on the number of bytes it can use.
>>>>> Otherwise the scanning algorithm in scsi_scan.c should do the
>>>>> correct thing, independent on the 'max_lun' setting.
>>>>
>>>> So you are saying we can remove the line ?
>>>>
>>> Ho-hum. In principle you could, as ibmvscsi is using SRP internally,
>>> which does support 64 bit LUNs.
>>>
>>> However, due to some weird design decisions there is
>>> the function 'lun_from_dev()', which mangles the incoming LUN number
>>> into something ... else.
>>> Which leaves only 4 bits free for the actual LUN number, requiring
>>> you to use max_lun = 16.
>>>
>>> Personally I would just do away with that function and use the
>>> incoming LUN numbers as is.
>>
>> I pulled out my copy of SAM, what lun_from_dev is doing is translating
>> the incoming bus / id / LUN to a LUN in the logical unit addressing format,
>> as defined in 4.6.9 of SAM-4.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> |Bit | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
>> --------------------------------------
>> | n  | (10b) |       Target          |
>> --------------------------------------
>> | n+1|   Bus     |        LUN        |
>> --------------------------------------
>>
>> So this means, in the current implementation, we have 6 bits for target (max=63),
>> 3 bits for bus (max=7), and 5 bits for LUN (max=31). 
>>
>> It might not be a bad idea to enforce these limits on the module parameters. Otherwise
>> we'll have a mess when we run through lun_from_dev...
>>
> Correct. With the current implementation we need to set max_lun to 31.
> 
>> As far as eliminating lun_from_dev and just passing the LUN through, I don't think we
>> can do that. The LUN list returned by Report LUNs to a VSCSI disk assumes we are
>> doing the translation above.
>>
> ? How can that be ?

I was just going by what sg_luns returned on a VSCSI disk:

[root@powerio-blue-lp6 ~]# lsscsi
[0:0:1:0]    disk    AIX      VDASD            0001  /dev/sda 
[0:0:2:0]    cd/dvd  AIX      VOPTA                  /dev/sr0 
[0:0:3:0]    disk    AIX      VDASD            0001  /dev/sdb 
[0:0:4:0]    disk    AIX      VDASD            0001  /dev/sdc 
[0:0:7:0]    cd/dvd  AIX      VOPTA                  /dev/sr1 

[root@powerio-blue-lp6 ~]# sg_luns /dev/sda
Lun list length = 8 which imples 1 lun entry
Report luns [select_report=0x0]:
    0000000000000000
[root@powerio-blue-lp6 ~]# sg_luns /dev/sdb
Lun list length = 8 which imples 1 lun entry
Report luns [select_report=0x0]:
    0000000000000000

This is without your patch, but I don't think there should be any filtering of
report luns even in this case. Its what the VIOS is returning that is at
issue here. 

Thanks,

Brian

-- 
Brian King
Power Linux I/O
IBM Linux Technology Center

      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-05 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-04 10:20 [PATCH v2 0/3] ibmvscsi parameter cleanup Laurent Vivier
2015-11-04 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ibmvscsi: make parameters max_id and max_channel read-only Laurent Vivier
2015-11-04 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ibmvscsi: display default value for max_id, max_lun and max_channel Laurent Vivier
2015-11-04 10:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ibmvscsi: Allow to configure maximum LUN Laurent Vivier
2015-11-04 10:24   ` Laurent Vivier
2015-11-04 11:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-04 11:46     ` Laurent Vivier
2015-11-04 13:02       ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-04 23:06         ` Brian King
2015-11-05  8:26           ` Laurent Vivier
2015-11-05 20:00             ` Brian King
2015-11-05  8:51           ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-05 19:01             ` Brian King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=563BA7A1.8090104@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.