All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Caesar Wang <wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] thermal: rockchip: improve the conversion function
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 22:41:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <563E0DB6.3010704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151106190006.GB8202-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>

Hello Eduardo,

在 2015年11月07日 03:00, Eduardo Valentin 写道:
> Hello Caesar,
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:18:00PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> We should make the conversion table in as a parameter since the different
>> SoCs have the different conversionion table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - make the conversion table in as a parameter both code_to_temp
>>    and temp_to_code function.
>
> Now it looks cleaner. Thanks.
>
> The comments below are probably not directly on this change. You may
> want to add a different patch that takes care of the suggestions that
> follows.

Okay, I will send a another patch to fix it.
Thanks your reviewing this patch.




>> Series-changes: 1
>> - As Dmitry comment, make the conversion table in as a parameter.
>>
>> Changes in v1: None
>>
>>   drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> index bdf7063..e828f18 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,16 @@ enum sensor_id {
>>    */
>>   #define SOC_MAX_SENSORS	2
>>   
>> +struct chip_tsadc_table {
>> +	const struct tsadc_table *id;
>> +
>> +	/* the array table size*/
>> +	unsigned int length;
>> +
>> +	/* that analogic mask data */
>> +	unsigned long data_mask;
> Are you sure this need to be long?

Seem.....we should mark the 'unsigned int  or u32'.


>> +};
>> +
>>   struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
>>   	/* The sensor id of chip correspond to the ADC channel */
>>   	int chn_id[SOC_MAX_SENSORS];
>> @@ -74,9 +84,14 @@ struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
>>   	void (*control)(void __iomem *reg, bool on);
>>   
>>   	/* Per-sensor methods */
>> -	int (*get_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
>> -	void (*set_tshut_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
>> +	int (*get_temp)(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +			int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
>> +	void (*set_tshut_temp)(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +			       int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
> Temperature is currently represented as int not long in the thermal
> framework. You may want to send a different patch that normalize the
> temperature representation in your driver (long -> int).

Okay

>>   	void (*set_tshut_mode)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, enum tshut_mode m);
>> +
>> +	/* Per-table methods */
>> +	struct chip_tsadc_table table;
>>   };
>>   
>>   struct rockchip_thermal_sensor {
>> @@ -172,21 +187,22 @@ static const struct tsadc_table v2_code_table[] = {
>>   	{3421, 125000},
>>   };
>>   
>> -static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
>> +static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +				   long temp)
> Same comment here.

Okay
>>   {
>>   	int high, low, mid;
>>   
>>   	low = 0;
>> -	high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
>> +	high = table.length - 1;
>>   	mid = (high + low) / 2;
>>   
>> -	if (temp < v2_code_table[low].temp || temp > v2_code_table[high].temp)
>> +	if (temp < table.id[low].temp || temp > table.id[high].temp)
>>   		return 0;
>>   
>>   	while (low <= high) {
>> -		if (temp == v2_code_table[mid].temp)
>> -			return v2_code_table[mid].code;
>> -		else if (temp < v2_code_table[mid].temp)
>> +		if (temp == table.id[mid].temp)
>> +			return table.id[mid].code;
>> +		else if (temp < table.id[mid].temp)
>>   			high = mid - 1;
>>   		else
>>   			low = mid + 1;
>> @@ -196,25 +212,26 @@ static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>> +static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
>> +				   int *temp)
> Here you are ok already.
>
>>   {
>>   	unsigned int low = 1;
>> -	unsigned int high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
>> +	unsigned int high = table.length - 1;
>>   	unsigned int mid = (low + high) / 2;
>>   	unsigned int num;
>>   	unsigned long denom;
>>   
>> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) < 2);
>> +	WARN_ON(table.length < 2);
>>   
>> -	code &= TSADCV2_DATA_MASK;
>> -	if (code < v2_code_table[high].code)
>> +	code &= table.data_mask;
>> +	if (code < table.id[high].code)
>>   		return -EAGAIN;		/* Incorrect reading */
>>   
>>   	while (low <= high) {
>> -		if (code >= v2_code_table[mid].code &&
>> -		    code < v2_code_table[mid - 1].code)
>> +		if (code >= table.id[mid].code &&
>> +		    code < table.id[mid - 1].code)
>>   			break;
>> -		else if (code < v2_code_table[mid].code)
>> +		else if (code < table.id[mid].code)
>>   			low = mid + 1;
>>   		else
>>   			high = mid - 1;
>> @@ -227,10 +244,10 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>>   	 * temperature between 2 table entries is linear and interpolate
>>   	 * to produce less granular result.
>>   	 */
>> -	num = v2_code_table[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
>> -	num *= v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - code;
>> -	denom = v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - v2_code_table[mid].code;
>> -	*temp = v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
>> +	num = table.id[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
>> +	num *= table.id[mid - 1].code - code;
>> +	denom = table.id[mid - 1].code - table.id[mid].code;
>> +	*temp = table.id[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> @@ -290,20 +307,22 @@ static void rk_tsadcv2_control(void __iomem *regs, bool enable)
>>   	writel_relaxed(val, regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>> +static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +			       int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>>   {
>>   	u32 val;
>>   
>>   	val = readl_relaxed(regs + TSADCV2_DATA(chn));
>>   
>> -	return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(val, temp);
>> +	return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(table, val, temp);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
>> +static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +				  int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
> Here needs fixing.

Okay.

>
> BR,
>
> Eduardo Valentin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: caesar.upstream@gmail.com (Caesar Wang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/9] thermal: rockchip: improve the conversion function
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 22:41:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <563E0DB6.3010704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151106190006.GB8202@localhost.localdomain>

Hello Eduardo,

? 2015?11?07? 03:00, Eduardo Valentin ??:
> Hello Caesar,
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:18:00PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> We should make the conversion table in as a parameter since the different
>> SoCs have the different conversionion table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - make the conversion table in as a parameter both code_to_temp
>>    and temp_to_code function.
>
> Now it looks cleaner. Thanks.
>
> The comments below are probably not directly on this change. You may
> want to add a different patch that takes care of the suggestions that
> follows.

Okay, I will send a another patch to fix it.
Thanks your reviewing this patch.




>> Series-changes: 1
>> - As Dmitry comment, make the conversion table in as a parameter.
>>
>> Changes in v1: None
>>
>>   drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> index bdf7063..e828f18 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,16 @@ enum sensor_id {
>>    */
>>   #define SOC_MAX_SENSORS	2
>>   
>> +struct chip_tsadc_table {
>> +	const struct tsadc_table *id;
>> +
>> +	/* the array table size*/
>> +	unsigned int length;
>> +
>> +	/* that analogic mask data */
>> +	unsigned long data_mask;
> Are you sure this need to be long?

Seem.....we should mark the 'unsigned int  or u32'.


>> +};
>> +
>>   struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
>>   	/* The sensor id of chip correspond to the ADC channel */
>>   	int chn_id[SOC_MAX_SENSORS];
>> @@ -74,9 +84,14 @@ struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
>>   	void (*control)(void __iomem *reg, bool on);
>>   
>>   	/* Per-sensor methods */
>> -	int (*get_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
>> -	void (*set_tshut_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
>> +	int (*get_temp)(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +			int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
>> +	void (*set_tshut_temp)(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +			       int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
> Temperature is currently represented as int not long in the thermal
> framework. You may want to send a different patch that normalize the
> temperature representation in your driver (long -> int).

Okay

>>   	void (*set_tshut_mode)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, enum tshut_mode m);
>> +
>> +	/* Per-table methods */
>> +	struct chip_tsadc_table table;
>>   };
>>   
>>   struct rockchip_thermal_sensor {
>> @@ -172,21 +187,22 @@ static const struct tsadc_table v2_code_table[] = {
>>   	{3421, 125000},
>>   };
>>   
>> -static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
>> +static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +				   long temp)
> Same comment here.

Okay
>>   {
>>   	int high, low, mid;
>>   
>>   	low = 0;
>> -	high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
>> +	high = table.length - 1;
>>   	mid = (high + low) / 2;
>>   
>> -	if (temp < v2_code_table[low].temp || temp > v2_code_table[high].temp)
>> +	if (temp < table.id[low].temp || temp > table.id[high].temp)
>>   		return 0;
>>   
>>   	while (low <= high) {
>> -		if (temp == v2_code_table[mid].temp)
>> -			return v2_code_table[mid].code;
>> -		else if (temp < v2_code_table[mid].temp)
>> +		if (temp == table.id[mid].temp)
>> +			return table.id[mid].code;
>> +		else if (temp < table.id[mid].temp)
>>   			high = mid - 1;
>>   		else
>>   			low = mid + 1;
>> @@ -196,25 +212,26 @@ static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>> +static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
>> +				   int *temp)
> Here you are ok already.
>
>>   {
>>   	unsigned int low = 1;
>> -	unsigned int high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
>> +	unsigned int high = table.length - 1;
>>   	unsigned int mid = (low + high) / 2;
>>   	unsigned int num;
>>   	unsigned long denom;
>>   
>> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) < 2);
>> +	WARN_ON(table.length < 2);
>>   
>> -	code &= TSADCV2_DATA_MASK;
>> -	if (code < v2_code_table[high].code)
>> +	code &= table.data_mask;
>> +	if (code < table.id[high].code)
>>   		return -EAGAIN;		/* Incorrect reading */
>>   
>>   	while (low <= high) {
>> -		if (code >= v2_code_table[mid].code &&
>> -		    code < v2_code_table[mid - 1].code)
>> +		if (code >= table.id[mid].code &&
>> +		    code < table.id[mid - 1].code)
>>   			break;
>> -		else if (code < v2_code_table[mid].code)
>> +		else if (code < table.id[mid].code)
>>   			low = mid + 1;
>>   		else
>>   			high = mid - 1;
>> @@ -227,10 +244,10 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>>   	 * temperature between 2 table entries is linear and interpolate
>>   	 * to produce less granular result.
>>   	 */
>> -	num = v2_code_table[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
>> -	num *= v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - code;
>> -	denom = v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - v2_code_table[mid].code;
>> -	*temp = v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
>> +	num = table.id[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
>> +	num *= table.id[mid - 1].code - code;
>> +	denom = table.id[mid - 1].code - table.id[mid].code;
>> +	*temp = table.id[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> @@ -290,20 +307,22 @@ static void rk_tsadcv2_control(void __iomem *regs, bool enable)
>>   	writel_relaxed(val, regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>> +static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +			       int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>>   {
>>   	u32 val;
>>   
>>   	val = readl_relaxed(regs + TSADCV2_DATA(chn));
>>   
>> -	return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(val, temp);
>> +	return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(table, val, temp);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
>> +static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +				  int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
> Here needs fixing.

Okay.

>
> BR,
>
> Eduardo Valentin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@gmail.com>
To: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] thermal: rockchip: improve the conversion function
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 22:41:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <563E0DB6.3010704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151106190006.GB8202@localhost.localdomain>

Hello Eduardo,

在 2015年11月07日 03:00, Eduardo Valentin 写道:
> Hello Caesar,
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:18:00PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>> We should make the conversion table in as a parameter since the different
>> SoCs have the different conversionion table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - make the conversion table in as a parameter both code_to_temp
>>    and temp_to_code function.
>
> Now it looks cleaner. Thanks.
>
> The comments below are probably not directly on this change. You may
> want to add a different patch that takes care of the suggestions that
> follows.

Okay, I will send a another patch to fix it.
Thanks your reviewing this patch.




>> Series-changes: 1
>> - As Dmitry comment, make the conversion table in as a parameter.
>>
>> Changes in v1: None
>>
>>   drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>   1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> index bdf7063..e828f18 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,16 @@ enum sensor_id {
>>    */
>>   #define SOC_MAX_SENSORS	2
>>   
>> +struct chip_tsadc_table {
>> +	const struct tsadc_table *id;
>> +
>> +	/* the array table size*/
>> +	unsigned int length;
>> +
>> +	/* that analogic mask data */
>> +	unsigned long data_mask;
> Are you sure this need to be long?

Seem.....we should mark the 'unsigned int  or u32'.


>> +};
>> +
>>   struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
>>   	/* The sensor id of chip correspond to the ADC channel */
>>   	int chn_id[SOC_MAX_SENSORS];
>> @@ -74,9 +84,14 @@ struct rockchip_tsadc_chip {
>>   	void (*control)(void __iomem *reg, bool on);
>>   
>>   	/* Per-sensor methods */
>> -	int (*get_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
>> -	void (*set_tshut_temp)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
>> +	int (*get_temp)(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +			int chn, void __iomem *reg, int *temp);
>> +	void (*set_tshut_temp)(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +			       int chn, void __iomem *reg, long temp);
> Temperature is currently represented as int not long in the thermal
> framework. You may want to send a different patch that normalize the
> temperature representation in your driver (long -> int).

Okay

>>   	void (*set_tshut_mode)(int chn, void __iomem *reg, enum tshut_mode m);
>> +
>> +	/* Per-table methods */
>> +	struct chip_tsadc_table table;
>>   };
>>   
>>   struct rockchip_thermal_sensor {
>> @@ -172,21 +187,22 @@ static const struct tsadc_table v2_code_table[] = {
>>   	{3421, 125000},
>>   };
>>   
>> -static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
>> +static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +				   long temp)
> Same comment here.

Okay
>>   {
>>   	int high, low, mid;
>>   
>>   	low = 0;
>> -	high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
>> +	high = table.length - 1;
>>   	mid = (high + low) / 2;
>>   
>> -	if (temp < v2_code_table[low].temp || temp > v2_code_table[high].temp)
>> +	if (temp < table.id[low].temp || temp > table.id[high].temp)
>>   		return 0;
>>   
>>   	while (low <= high) {
>> -		if (temp == v2_code_table[mid].temp)
>> -			return v2_code_table[mid].code;
>> -		else if (temp < v2_code_table[mid].temp)
>> +		if (temp == table.id[mid].temp)
>> +			return table.id[mid].code;
>> +		else if (temp < table.id[mid].temp)
>>   			high = mid - 1;
>>   		else
>>   			low = mid + 1;
>> @@ -196,25 +212,26 @@ static u32 rk_tsadcv2_temp_to_code(long temp)
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>> +static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table, u32 code,
>> +				   int *temp)
> Here you are ok already.
>
>>   {
>>   	unsigned int low = 1;
>> -	unsigned int high = ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) - 1;
>> +	unsigned int high = table.length - 1;
>>   	unsigned int mid = (low + high) / 2;
>>   	unsigned int num;
>>   	unsigned long denom;
>>   
>> -	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(v2_code_table) < 2);
>> +	WARN_ON(table.length < 2);
>>   
>> -	code &= TSADCV2_DATA_MASK;
>> -	if (code < v2_code_table[high].code)
>> +	code &= table.data_mask;
>> +	if (code < table.id[high].code)
>>   		return -EAGAIN;		/* Incorrect reading */
>>   
>>   	while (low <= high) {
>> -		if (code >= v2_code_table[mid].code &&
>> -		    code < v2_code_table[mid - 1].code)
>> +		if (code >= table.id[mid].code &&
>> +		    code < table.id[mid - 1].code)
>>   			break;
>> -		else if (code < v2_code_table[mid].code)
>> +		else if (code < table.id[mid].code)
>>   			low = mid + 1;
>>   		else
>>   			high = mid - 1;
>> @@ -227,10 +244,10 @@ static int rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(u32 code, int *temp)
>>   	 * temperature between 2 table entries is linear and interpolate
>>   	 * to produce less granular result.
>>   	 */
>> -	num = v2_code_table[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
>> -	num *= v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - code;
>> -	denom = v2_code_table[mid - 1].code - v2_code_table[mid].code;
>> -	*temp = v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
>> +	num = table.id[mid].temp - v2_code_table[mid - 1].temp;
>> +	num *= table.id[mid - 1].code - code;
>> +	denom = table.id[mid - 1].code - table.id[mid].code;
>> +	*temp = table.id[mid - 1].temp + (num / denom);
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>> @@ -290,20 +307,22 @@ static void rk_tsadcv2_control(void __iomem *regs, bool enable)
>>   	writel_relaxed(val, regs + TSADCV2_AUTO_CON);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>> +static int rk_tsadcv2_get_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +			       int chn, void __iomem *regs, int *temp)
>>   {
>>   	u32 val;
>>   
>>   	val = readl_relaxed(regs + TSADCV2_DATA(chn));
>>   
>> -	return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(val, temp);
>> +	return rk_tsadcv2_code_to_temp(table, val, temp);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
>> +static void rk_tsadcv2_tshut_temp(struct chip_tsadc_table table,
>> +				  int chn, void __iomem *regs, long temp)
> Here needs fixing.

Okay.

>
> BR,
>
> Eduardo Valentin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-07 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-05  5:17 [PATCH v2 0/9] Better compatible for the rockchip thermal and support RK3368 SoCs Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:17 ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: rockchip-thermal: Support the RK3368 SoCs compatible Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:17   ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-05 23:45   ` Rob Herring
2015-11-05 23:45     ` Rob Herring
2015-11-05  5:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] thermal: rockchip: better to compatible the driver for different SoCs Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:17   ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] thermal: rockchip: trivial: fix typo in commit Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:17   ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] thermal: rockchip: improve the conversion function Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:18   ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-06 19:00   ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 19:00     ` Eduardo Valentin
     [not found]     ` <20151106190006.GB8202-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-07 14:41       ` Caesar Wang [this message]
2015-11-07 14:41         ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-07 14:41         ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] thermal: rockchip: Add the flag for adc value increment or decrement Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:18   ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-06 19:11   ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 19:11     ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-07 15:38     ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-07 15:38       ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-09  3:29       ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-09  3:29         ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:18 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] thermal: rockchip: Support the RK3368 SoCs in thermal drivers Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:18   ` Caesar Wang
     [not found]   ` <1446700685-18017-7-git-send-email-wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-06 19:39     ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-11-06 19:39       ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-11-06 19:39       ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-11-07 14:25       ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-07 14:25         ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:18 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] arm64: dts: Add the thermal data found on RK3368 Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:18   ` Caesar Wang
     [not found]   ` <1446700685-18017-8-git-send-email-wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-06 19:14     ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 19:14       ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 19:14       ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-05  5:18 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] arm64: dts: Add main Thermal info to rk3368.dtsi Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:18   ` Caesar Wang
     [not found]   ` <1446700685-18017-9-git-send-email-wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-06 19:15     ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 19:15       ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 19:15       ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-05  5:18 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] arm64: dts: Enable the Thermal on R88 board Caesar Wang
2015-11-05  5:18   ` Caesar Wang
     [not found]   ` <1446700685-18017-10-git-send-email-wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-06 19:16     ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 19:16       ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 19:16       ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 18:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Better compatible for the rockchip thermal and support RK3368 SoCs Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 18:47   ` Eduardo Valentin
     [not found]   ` <20151106184739.GA8202-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-06 19:03     ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-11-06 19:03       ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-11-06 19:03       ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-11-06 19:18       ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 19:18         ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-06 19:18         ` Eduardo Valentin
2015-11-07 15:53       ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-07 15:53         ` Caesar Wang
     [not found]         ` <563E1E7A.6010503-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-07 23:13           ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-11-07 23:13             ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-11-07 23:13             ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-11-08  9:39             ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-08  9:39               ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-07 15:47     ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-07 15:47       ` Caesar Wang
2015-11-07 15:47       ` Caesar Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=563E0DB6.3010704@gmail.com \
    --to=caesar.upstream-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=edubezval-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=heiko-4mtYJXux2i+zQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wxt-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.