From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladimir Zapolskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] pwm: lpc32xx: fixes in the LPC32xx PWM driver Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 08:48:51 +0200 Message-ID: <563EF053.8060305@mleia.com> References: <1444695653-23491-1-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mleia.com ([178.79.152.223]:43294 "EHLO mail.mleia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751219AbbKHGs4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2015 01:48:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1444695653-23491-1-git-send-email-vz@mleia.com> Sender: linux-pwm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org To: Thierry Reding Cc: Alexandre Pereira da Silva , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org On 13.10.2015 03:20, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > The changeset fixes a number of issues within current implementation > of LPC32xx PWM controller driver, namely > - the SoC has two independent PWM controllers with one channel each, > - runtime warnings from common clock framework, > - overflow in duty cycle calculation may result in disabled PWM, > - unsupported period values are silently accepted. > > Vladimir Zapolskiy (4): > pwm: lpc32xx: correct number of PWM channels from 2 to 1 > pwm: lpc32xx: fix warnings from common clock framework > pwm: lpc32xx: fix and simplify duty cycle and period calculations > pwm: lpc32xx: return ERANGE, if requested period is not supported > > drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > Hi Thierry, are you going to pick these changes up to PWM branch? Thanks in advance. -- Vladimir