From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Ian McDonald" Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:50:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6]: Fix calculation of t_ipi time of scheduled transmission Message-Id: <5640c7e00611230950o6c4fd8ablb564907d41cc8a5@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: References: <5640c7e00611210945l39bc33f5q3ab38c0bba022c1a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5640c7e00611210945l39bc33f5q3ab38c0bba022c1a@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: dccp@vger.kernel.org On 11/23/06, Gerrit Renker wrote: > | Gerrit - I was not trying to cast dispersions on you at all. I just > | wanted some time to review it properly as I've spent a bit of time in > | this code and would like to review CCID3 changes before they merge. > I understand this and this is the main reason why only send small, incremental patches; and > strive to give a justification for each step. In this way it is easier to verify whether the > changes actually improve the code or if they are not necessary. What I want to avoid is > messing up someone else's code. > Don't worry about that. The code is already a mess and needs some demessing I think :-) > Since your last email I have spent some more time going through the standard documents; if you > agree then it may be good to update - will review and prepare patches for review. Of course - go ahead as I want DCCP to keep improving and geting better. -- Ian McDonald Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4 Blog: http://imcdnzl.blogspot.com WAND Network Research Group Department of Computer Science University of Waikato New Zealand