All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <56419C92.9050704@siemens.com>

diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 2b33116..9b9182d 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  "ref\0CALCETrW5_bKCX5gKYaH5y4rvD9jrjY5O5d=oX8hHtAM9EE2Bew@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "From\0Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] virtio core DMA API conversion\0"
- "Date\0Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:28:18 +0100\0"
+ "Date\0Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:28:18 +0000\0"
  "To\0Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>"
  " Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>\0"
  "Cc\0Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>"
@@ -83,4 +83,4 @@
  "Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE\n"
  Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
 
-295cd2be0bfc709a589b1e2efd4d7eb4bb5201c84e9921c5431bef1c082fc3d2
+76a8283dc2888def4b54e9b32f0adf717240c9d380009ee06a25b3882375a1b4

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 1a05c75..29f6bb5 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ On 2015-11-10 03:18, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
 > IOW, I think that on x86 we should assume that all virtio devices
 > honor the IOMMU.
 
-From the guest driver POV, that is OK because either there is no IOMMU
+>From the guest driver POV, that is OK because either there is no IOMMU
 to program (the current situation with qemu), there can be one that
 doesn't need it (the current situation with qemu and iommu=on) or there
 is (Xen) or will be (future qemu) one that requires it.
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index 2b33116..ca23287 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
  "> IOW, I think that on x86 we should assume that all virtio devices\n"
  "> honor the IOMMU.\n"
  "\n"
- "From the guest driver POV, that is OK because either there is no IOMMU\n"
+ ">From the guest driver POV, that is OK because either there is no IOMMU\n"
  "to program (the current situation with qemu), there can be one that\n"
  "doesn't need it (the current situation with qemu and iommu=on) or there\n"
  "is (Xen) or will be (future qemu) one that requires it.\n"
@@ -83,4 +83,4 @@
  "Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE\n"
  Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
 
-295cd2be0bfc709a589b1e2efd4d7eb4bb5201c84e9921c5431bef1c082fc3d2
+f98e3b87f79a333530aeaa3ab3d7d7c164612e81d83681563ece396ee83f7afa

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt
index 1a05c75..29f6bb5 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N3/1.txt
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ On 2015-11-10 03:18, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
 > IOW, I think that on x86 we should assume that all virtio devices
 > honor the IOMMU.
 
-From the guest driver POV, that is OK because either there is no IOMMU
+>From the guest driver POV, that is OK because either there is no IOMMU
 to program (the current situation with qemu), there can be one that
 doesn't need it (the current situation with qemu and iommu=on) or there
 is (Xen) or will be (future qemu) one that requires it.
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest
index 2b33116..66b674d 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N3/content_digest
@@ -9,21 +9,22 @@
  "Date\0Tue, 10 Nov 2015 08:28:18 +0100\0"
  "To\0Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>"
  " Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>\0"
- "Cc\0Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>"
-  KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
-  linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
-  Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
-  Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+ "Cc\0Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>"
+  David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
   linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
-  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-  Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
-  Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
+  David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
   sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
+  Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
+  Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
+  Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
+  Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
+  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
+  KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
+  Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
+  linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
   Linux Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
-  David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
-  David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- " Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>\0"
+ " Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 2015-11-10 03:18, Andy Lutomirski wrote:\n"
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@
  "> IOW, I think that on x86 we should assume that all virtio devices\n"
  "> honor the IOMMU.\n"
  "\n"
- "From the guest driver POV, that is OK because either there is no IOMMU\n"
+ ">From the guest driver POV, that is OK because either there is no IOMMU\n"
  "to program (the current situation with qemu), there can be one that\n"
  "doesn't need it (the current situation with qemu and iommu=on) or there\n"
  "is (Xen) or will be (future qemu) one that requires it.\n"
@@ -83,4 +84,4 @@
  "Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE\n"
  Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
 
-295cd2be0bfc709a589b1e2efd4d7eb4bb5201c84e9921c5431bef1c082fc3d2
+7f3382904120efb2b867456810bae2a64ded8b88f62e4ec32f8463bf5b75c4a7

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.