From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8209D76A51 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2015 05:24:19 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,270,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="832864856" Received: from kanavin-desktop.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.68.161]) ([10.237.68.161]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2015 05:24:18 -0800 Message-ID: <5641F042.5080704@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 15:25:22 +0200 From: Alexander Kanavin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jussi Kukkonen References: <74d946dc65eb898819b81599cc6ae3a43297056d.1447080392.git.alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/29] python-pygtk: remove the recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:24:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/10/2015 03:13 PM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > Are the pygtk changes directly related to the introspection changes? If > not then maybe they should happen in another patch set. They are; pygtk requires an old (2.x) non-introspection based version of pygobject, and the introspection patchset updates pygobject to latest 3.x release which is a much thinner layer on top of libgirepository and is incompatible with pygtk. Alex