From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yang Subject: Re: Re: can-j1939 API Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:58:07 -0500 Message-ID: <5642686F.5020708@purdue.edu> References: <560ADC91.1090408@pengutronix.de> <20150929194920.GA11430@airbook.vandijck-laurijssen.be> <20151018023225.GA29078@airbook.vandijck-laurijssen.be> <20151019204442.GA16852@airbook.vandijck-laurijssen.be> <20151023111430.GB22388@airbook.eia.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailhub131.itcs.purdue.edu ([128.210.5.131]:51490 "EHLO mailhub131.itcs.purdue.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752125AbbKJWFB (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:05:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20151023111430.GB22388@airbook.eia.lan> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Alex Layton , linux-can On 10/23/2015 07:14 AM, Kurt Van Dijck wrote: > I'll do the necessary modifications. > This has become a rather low-priority task nowadays, although I think > there is a momentum to make progress now. I am working with Alex, the author of https://github.com/ISOBlue/isoblue-software on a project that uses j1939. With Alex's module, we wrote another program to receive messages and get the PGN out of each message. After looking through this thread, it seems like your module could do the same thing and it looks promising that your module will be added into the main linux kernel. You mentioned that there are things you need to fix and change. I'm currently looking into writing a JNI wrapper for the j1939 module you have. My question is: as you make modifications to the API, how much will change? I can't/don't want to write the JNI wrapper if the code will keep changing significantly.