From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
To: Ricard Wanderlof <ricard.wanderlof@axis.com>,
Felipe Ferreri Tonello <eu@felipetonello.com>
Cc: alsa-devel <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Subject: Re: Unregister a card from userspace?
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:09:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56433E0A.20804@metafoo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511111348380.11990@lnxricardw1.se.axis.com>
On 11/11/2015 01:59 PM, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Felipe Ferreri Tonello wrote:
>
>>> But that is precisely the problem. The framework that manages the
>>> insertion and deletion of modules notes that my module has a usage count
>>> that is > 0 (in my case it is 2, which I'm convinced is because the card
>>> has been registered with ALSA), and refuses to free the module. So there
>>> is now way any unregister_card call can be made when my module is freed,
>>> as due to the usage count it would never even be attempted.
>>
>> Do you mean that unbind is never called? Well, the framework should call
>> bind/unbind for each user of your module.
>
> Ok, I didn't know that. It's the first time I've been writing an ALSA
> driver as a loadable module.
>
>> How is your architecture? If you use one card for each probe of module
>> then each bind should create one device, right?
>
> In this case, it is a device which is located on the SoC. There is only
> one instance of it. When the module is loaded, it loads a codec driver
> with its associated DAI driver, a PCM driver, snd-soc-dummy-dai, and then
> a machine driver to tie it all together, finally registering the card with
> ALSA.
>
> Looking in /sys/bus/platform/devices, there seems to be one device created
> for the codec itself, and one for the machine driver. I don't know if
> that's right or wrong, the ALSA driver hierarchy works in the sense that I
> can capture audio from it anyway.
Which one is the module you can't unload? The module that contains the
machine driver should only have its reference count increment when a
playback or capture stream is active so you can't remove it when it is
actively in use.
- Lars
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-11 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-04 9:36 Unregister a card from userspace? Ricard Wanderlof
2015-11-04 11:24 ` Clemens Ladisch
2015-11-12 13:07 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2015-11-12 13:26 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-11-12 15:38 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2015-11-09 11:24 ` Felipe Ferreri Tonello
2015-11-10 7:55 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2015-11-11 10:34 ` Felipe Ferreri Tonello
2015-11-11 12:59 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2015-11-11 13:09 ` Lars-Peter Clausen [this message]
2015-11-11 15:24 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2015-11-11 14:50 ` Felipe Ferreri Tonello
2015-11-11 15:33 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2015-11-12 10:31 ` Felipe Ferreri Tonello
2015-11-12 14:02 ` Ricard Wanderlof
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56433E0A.20804@metafoo.de \
--to=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=eu@felipetonello.com \
--cc=ricard.wanderlof@axis.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.