From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.windriver.com (mail.windriver.com [147.11.1.11]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6683772D0 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id tADBjh3j026004 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:45:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.224.162.159] (128.224.162.159) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:45:42 -0800 Message-ID: <5645CD5C.8040908@windriver.com> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:45:32 +0800 From: Hongxu Jia User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , Martin Jansa References: <1447409052-30874-1-git-send-email-hongxu.jia@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [meta-xfce][PATCH] meta-xfce/layer: explicitly set networkmanager to NETWORK_MANAGER X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:45:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 11/13/2015 06:36 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: >> Why not use VIRTUAL-RUNTIME variable like in other places? And if it's >> needed by xfce4-power-manager, then why don't you add it to RDEPENDS there? >> > networkmanager is already in RDEPENDS of xfce4-power-manager. I think > when building an image packagegroup-core-x11-sato there is a conflict. > > I looked into this a bit more and think: > 1. networkmanger support is optional so a packagroup would allow > conman and xfce4-power-manager live together in harmony > 2. I think the patch goes much to far: To have networkmanager in > images based on packagegroup-core-x11-sato the correct way would be to > write NETWORK_MANAGER = "networkmanager" in the image recipe. Hi Andreas, The condition of writing NETWORK_MANAGER = "networkmanager" is packagegroup-core-x11-sato + xfce4-power-manager, I think it is not proper to test the existence of them in an image recipe. Hi Martin & Andreas, How about we still do the setting in meta-xfce's local.conf and replace networkmanager with variable ${NETWORK_MANAGER} in xfce4-power-manager's RDEPENDS. So we could globally control network manager by variable ${NETWORK_MANAGER} for the similar issue. //Hongxu > Andreas