On 2015-11-13 05:17, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
>   Sorry for the delay.
>   Trying to find out if there is any pending concerns...
FWIW, I'm planning on setting up a VM to test this over the weekend (I 
would have already, but I've been kind of busy at work this week), so 
I'll hopefully have some more feedback on Monday.
>
>> Hopefully, per-filesystem hot-spares will be a high priority too, as
>> that type of usage is pretty much required for many enterprise type
>> uses, although that doesn't need to be the same code doing it (in fact,
>> I could see having per-fs spares and global spares both available
>> potentially being very useful).
>
>   That's doable with in the current design as well, however stability
>   and hardening (fixing the possible loop holes) is kind of priority.
Entirely understandable, I would actually be somewhat worried if 
stability and hardening weren't the priority right now.