From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: __i915_spin_request() sucks Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 09:22:52 -0700 Message-ID: <56460E5C.6000602@kernel.dk> References: <5644F850.2060803@kernel.dk> <5644F941.9090505@kernel.dk> <20151112221908.GA26194@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <56451812.2050704@kernel.dk> <20151113091558.GN6247@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> <20151113153629.GB8939@kernel.dk> <1447431225.5655.66.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1447431225.5655.66.camel@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Galbraith Cc: Chris Wilson , Daniel Vetter , DRI Development , LKML List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On 11/13/2015 09:13 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-13 at 08:36 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> Previous patch was obvious pre-coffee crap, this should work for using >> ktime to spin max 1usec. > > 1us seems a tad low. I doubt the little wooden gears and pulleys of my > core2 Toshiba Satellite lappy can get one loop ground out in a usec :) Maybe it is, it's based off the original intent of the function, though. See the original commit referenced. -- Jens Axboe