From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZyO5B-0006b5-30 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:00:49 +0000 Subject: Re: spi: OF module autoloading is still broken To: Mark Brown References: <56104E88.3040807@gmail.com> <20151112185926.GC8456@google.com> <20151113194031.GI8456@google.com> <20151113221228.GT12392@sirena.org.uk> <20151113225113.GJ8456@google.com> <20151113231410.GV12392@sirena.org.uk> <20151113234857.GK8456@google.com> <20151116135342.GD31303@sirena.org.uk> <564A11D9.80109@osg.samsung.com> <20151116175112.GH31303@sirena.org.uk> Cc: Brian Norris , Heiner Kallweit , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Dmitry Torokhov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org From: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: <564A19B7.7000802@osg.samsung.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:00:23 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151116175112.GH31303@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello Mark, On 11/16/2015 02:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:26:49PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> What I don't really understand here is why we've decided to push all >>> this stuff into the subsystems, it seems like if we're managing to do >>> the matching based on the compatible we really ought to be able to have >>> the core figure out the uevents for us too. I need to go have a look at >>> that... > >> There is already a set of generic OF uevents that are reported by the core >> but IIUC those are not used by udev. Please take a look to of_device_uevent() >> in drivers/of/device.c and dev_uevent() that calls it in drivers/base/core.c. > > I know what the current situation is, my point is that I don't > understand why we would choose to do that ("What I don't really > understand here..."). > Got it, sorry for misunderstanding you. I also don't know the answer FWIW. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: spi: OF module autoloading is still broken Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:00:23 -0300 Message-ID: <564A19B7.7000802@osg.samsung.com> References: <56104E88.3040807@gmail.com> <20151112185926.GC8456@google.com> <20151113194031.GI8456@google.com> <20151113221228.GT12392@sirena.org.uk> <20151113225113.GJ8456@google.com> <20151113231410.GV12392@sirena.org.uk> <20151113234857.GK8456@google.com> <20151116135342.GD31303@sirena.org.uk> <564A11D9.80109@osg.samsung.com> <20151116175112.GH31303@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brian Norris , Heiner Kallweit , linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Dmitry Torokhov , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151116175112.GH31303-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-spi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Hello Mark, On 11/16/2015 02:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:26:49PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> On 11/16/2015 10:53 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> What I don't really understand here is why we've decided to push all >>> this stuff into the subsystems, it seems like if we're managing to do >>> the matching based on the compatible we really ought to be able to have >>> the core figure out the uevents for us too. I need to go have a look at >>> that... > >> There is already a set of generic OF uevents that are reported by the core >> but IIUC those are not used by udev. Please take a look to of_device_uevent() >> in drivers/of/device.c and dev_uevent() that calls it in drivers/base/core.c. > > I know what the current situation is, my point is that I don't > understand why we would choose to do that ("What I don't really > understand here..."). > Got it, sorry for misunderstanding you. I also don't know the answer FWIW. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html