From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wols Lists <antlists@youngman.org.uk>
Subject: Re: WD Red vs Black drives for RAID1
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:55:58 +0000
Message-ID: <564A42DE.1080203@youngman.org.uk>
References: <22090.1097.258820.65463@quad.stoffel.home>
 <564A203C.1020309@turmel.org> <22090.13317.824290.574006@quad.stoffel.home>
 <564A3651.1010105@turmel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <564A3651.1010105@turmel.org>
Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Phil Turmel <philip@turmel.org>, John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>
Cc: Linux-RAID <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

On 16/11/15 20:02, Phil Turmel wrote:
> Seagate was the brand that screwed me first with the industry-wide
> deletion of ERC support in desktop drives.  Hitachi held onto it the
> longest.  Whatever you consider, read the data sheets carefully to
> ensure they have ERC support.  Google the model number along with
> 'linux-raid' and 'scterc' to see our past experiences with specific drives.

Oddly enough, when I was looking at the model number for the Seagate NAS
drives, I noticed they started with HDS ...

Cheers,
Wol