Re: v0.80.11 QE validation status

[Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>]

Hi Yuri,

Thanks for the update :-) Should we mark #11104 as resolved ?

Cheers

On 16/11/2015 19:45, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> This release QE validation took longer time due to the #11104
> additional fixing/testing and discovered related to it issues ##13794,
> 13622
>
> We agreed to release v0.80.11 based on tests results.
>
> Thx
> YuriW
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Summary of suites executed for this release can be found in
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644
>>
>> rados - 1/7th passed
>>
>> rbd - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11104
>>
>> rgw - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11104
>>
>> fs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11104, http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13630
>>
>> krbd - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13631
>>
>> kcephfs - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13631,
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13630
>>
>> samba - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/6613 sama as in v0.80.10 was
>> aprroved for release
>>
>> ceph-deploy(ubuntu_) - almost passed, 1 job is still running
>>
>> ceph-deploy(distros) - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13367
>>
>> upgrade/dumpling-x (to firefly)(distros) - passed
>>
>> upgrade/firefly(distros) - passed
>>
>> upgrades to giant - deprecated
>>
>> upgrade/firefly-x (to hammer)(distros) -
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11104,
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13632
>>
>> powercycle - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11104,
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13631
>>
>> All found problems seem unrelated to the product, however they
>> prevented some tests from running.  In particular #11104 is widespread
>> and has to be fixed (see also http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/13622 as
>> proposed workaround)
>>
>> I suggest we rerunning failed tests after addressing the issues above.
>>
>> Thx
>> YuriW