All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <564D96F8.2020609@suse.cz>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 2430cc1..288cafa 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 On 11/19/2015 09:22 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
 > On 11/18/2015 02:31 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
->> [CC += linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org]
+>> [CC += linux-api@vger.kernel.org]
 >> Anyway, I agree that it doesn't make sense to fail madvise when the given flag
 >> is already set. On the other hand, I don't think the userspace app should fail
 >> just because of madvise failing? It should in general be an advice that the
@@ -67,3 +67,9 @@ wouldn't object to removal.
 > in QEMU.
 
 Great, thanks :)
+
+--
+To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
+the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
+see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
+Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index a018f41..2d41915 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,26 +1,25 @@
  "ref\01447341516-18076-1-git-send-email-jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "ref\0564C7DCA.8010400@suse.cz\0"
  "ref\0564D86AE.1010305@de.ibm.com\0"
- "ref\0564D86AE.1010305-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "From\0Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] mm: Loosen MADV_NOHUGEPAGE to enable Qemu postcopy on s390\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:31:36 +0100\0"
- "To\0Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>"
-  Jason J. Herne <jjherne-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
- " linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0"
- "Cc\0linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org"
-  akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
-  aarcange-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
-  linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  qemu-devel <qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
-  Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
- " Juan Quintela <quintela-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "To\0Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>"
+  Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+ " linux-s390@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "Cc\0linux-mm@kvack.org"
+  akpm@linux-foundation.org
+  aarcange@redhat.com
+  linux-api@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-man@vger.kernel.org
+  qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
+  Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
+ " Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 11/19/2015 09:22 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:\n"
  "> On 11/18/2015 02:31 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:\n"
- ">> [CC += linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org]\n"
+ ">> [CC += linux-api@vger.kernel.org]\n"
  ">> Anyway, I agree that it doesn't make sense to fail madvise when the given flag\n"
  ">> is already set. On the other hand, I don't think the userspace app should fail\n"
  ">> just because of madvise failing? It should in general be an advice that the\n"
@@ -86,6 +85,12 @@
  "> And this code checks the return value. And yes, we should change that\n"
  "> in QEMU.\n"
  "\n"
- Great, thanks :)
+ "Great, thanks :)\n"
+ "\n"
+ "--\n"
+ "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n"
+ "the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,\n"
+ "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n"
+ "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>"
 
-f47c6b3191c9643639830e2a96d6571e085bc226b3e100cceaa80950ab17e793
+e46071787a3c0af95c7e9a592bfa9b1f6f35540c34e93ad7c7b15aa409a0b225

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt
index 2430cc1..960f54c 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N2/1.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 On 11/19/2015 09:22 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
 > On 11/18/2015 02:31 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
->> [CC += linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org]
+>> [CC += linux-api@vger.kernel.org]
 >> Anyway, I agree that it doesn't make sense to fail madvise when the given flag
 >> is already set. On the other hand, I don't think the userspace app should fail
 >> just because of madvise failing? It should in general be an advice that the
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest
index a018f41..ae2ca06 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N2/content_digest
@@ -1,26 +1,25 @@
  "ref\01447341516-18076-1-git-send-email-jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
  "ref\0564C7DCA.8010400@suse.cz\0"
  "ref\0564D86AE.1010305@de.ibm.com\0"
- "ref\0564D86AE.1010305-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org\0"
- "From\0Vlastimil Babka <vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] mm: Loosen MADV_NOHUGEPAGE to enable Qemu postcopy on s390\0"
+ "From\0Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mm: Loosen MADV_NOHUGEPAGE to enable Qemu postcopy on s390\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:31:36 +0100\0"
- "To\0Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger-tA70FqPdS9bQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>"
-  Jason J. Herne <jjherne-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
- " linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0"
- "Cc\0linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org"
-  akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
-  aarcange-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org
-  linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
-  qemu-devel <qemu-devel-qX2TKyscuCcdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
-  Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
- " Juan Quintela <quintela-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>\0"
+ "To\0Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>"
+  Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+ " linux-s390@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "Cc\0aarcange@redhat.com"
+  linux-man@vger.kernel.org
+  Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
+  linux-api@vger.kernel.org
+  qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
+  Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
+  linux-mm@kvack.org
+ " akpm@linux-foundation.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 11/19/2015 09:22 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:\n"
  "> On 11/18/2015 02:31 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:\n"
- ">> [CC += linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org]\n"
+ ">> [CC += linux-api@vger.kernel.org]\n"
  ">> Anyway, I agree that it doesn't make sense to fail madvise when the given flag\n"
  ">> is already set. On the other hand, I don't think the userspace app should fail\n"
  ">> just because of madvise failing? It should in general be an advice that the\n"
@@ -88,4 +87,4 @@
  "\n"
  Great, thanks :)
 
-f47c6b3191c9643639830e2a96d6571e085bc226b3e100cceaa80950ab17e793
+55e092aa5c9db6d6aafe7966e7905adac5b4e6477f3796e55ac75c035d84b9ef

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.