From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Use for_each_rmap_spte macro instead
 of pte_list_walk()
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 18:08:49 +0900
Message-ID: <564EE321.2020404@lab.ntt.co.jp>
References: <20151120174005.9880b89f54eee2cec2422da5@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <20151120174717.7b0c31caa267aa83027e8d8f@lab.ntt.co.jp>
 <564EDDCF.4080303@linux.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mtosatti@redhat.com
To: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>,
	pbonzini@redhat.com
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <564EDDCF.4080303@linux.intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 2015/11/20 17:46, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
> You just ignored my comment on the previous version...

I'm sorry but please read the explanation in patch 00.
I've read your comments and I'm not ignoring you.

Since this patch set has become huge than expected, I'm sending
this version so that patch 01-07 can be applied first.

For patch 08-10, I think we need to check more because there seems
to be some confusion between us.  You can also read other discussions
between Marcelo, Paolo and me.

Anyway, since these three patches has been placed at the end of the
series now, I hope we can concentrate on them easier than before.

Thanks,
   Takuya