From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: Add a SOCK_DESTROY operation to close sockets from userspace Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:51:06 -0700 Message-ID: <564F4F7A.9000508@cumulusnetworks.com> References: <20151119.005318.838757439536205791.davem@davemloft.net> <20151119.195504.2050784646947745419.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa , Eric Dumazet , Stephen Hemminger , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Eric Dumazet , Erik Kline , =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_=c5=bbenczykowski?= , Dmitry Torokhov To: Lorenzo Colitti , David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com ([209.85.213.182]:38343 "EHLO mail-ig0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760457AbbKTQvI (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:51:08 -0500 Received: by igbxm8 with SMTP id xm8so16111169igb.1 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 08:51:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/19/15 6:55 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > upstream alternatives. We might even be able to show up at netdev 1.1 > for some higher-bandwidth conversations. This use case would make a great talk for netdev. There are similar problems when netdev's are moved between namespaces (and VRFs).