Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] clk: Broadcom BCM63138 support

[Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>]

On 20/11/15 10:46, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/19, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 19/11/15 17:00, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 29/10/15 18:23, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> This patch series adds support for the Broadcom BCM63138 DSL SoCs
>>>> clocking framework.
>>>>
>>>> Since the HW is identical to the one found in Broadcom iProc SoCs, but the
>>>> integration is different (obviously), there is still a new compatible string
>>>> introduced just in case we happen to find issues in the future.
>>>>
>>>> Stephen, could you stage the two patches in a clk-bcm63xx branch that I could
>>>> later utilize while doing the arm-soc DT pull request?
>>>
>>> Stephen, can you queue the first two patches in a topic branch for me to
>>> merge as part of the commit adding the DTS changes?
>>
>> Well, now that I look back at the changes, you can actually merge the
>> two patches in clk-next, and the DTS changes can come in before or
>> after, it does not really matter, this would not cause breakage or
>> anything. Sorry for the noise.
> 
> Really? I thought if the clk patches aren't there then the dts
> change would cause some clocks to be orphaned. If that's ok with
> you it's ok with me.

Woah, I guess I was not thinking very clearly yesterday, yes, we need to
bundle these changes together, so if you are still okay with the topic
branch for me to include as a merge commit, that's fine with me as well.

/me needs to think twice before typing.
-- 
Florian