From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:35:11 +0100 Message-ID: <5653241F.4070704@linutronix.de> References: <1448263178-28397-1-git-send-email-jianchuan.wang@windriver.com> <201511231529.iE0YvIjj%fengguang.wu@intel.com> <20151123084325.4f0b4d62@gandalf.local.home> <20151123141408.GA24611@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-all@01.org, jianchuan.wang@windriver.com, tglx@linutronix.de, yang.shi@windriver.com To: Fengguang Wu , Steven Rostedt Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151123141408.GA24611@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: >> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang >> can have his tests either ignore these or test against the -rt trees. > > Yes sure. Shall I apply RT patches to this tree/branch? > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt I'm going to get you your kbot branch where you run bisect tests and everything and tests the patches against. The problem with this one is that we will drop it (or leave it stale) once we move to the next major kernel release. > Thanks, > Fengguang Sebastian